Educational drafts, not clinical approval
The medical textbook and topic questions are in development. A source-check date records an authoring check, not independent clinician approval. Each chapter shows its current clinical-review state.
Safety and boundaries
Understand what the material can tell you.
Education is the main focus of Doctor’s Passport. The textbook is still being authored and reviewed; its clinical status remains visible. The portfolio and pay-checker boundaries below apply to archived tools.
Use current clinical guidance
Rapid summaries support revision. For clinical decisions, consult current national and local guidance, the BNF or BNFC, product information and appropriate senior or specialist advice. These pages do not provide patient-specific care.
Results describe an attempt
A correct answer or a visited chapter is not proof of mastery, exam readiness or competence. The review list contains topics you choose to revisit, not an automated clinical assessment.
Report a correction
Send the chapter link and the point you believe needs review to hello@doctorspassport.co.uk. Do not include patient information.
You confirm the facts
Suggested or extracted information must be reviewed before it is used in a check, draft or export.
Official systems stay official
Employers, HMRC, assessors, Horus, Turas, specialty portfolios and the surgical eLogbook remain authoritative.
Professional evidence is never invented
The Passport does not create clinical encounters, achievements, assessor feedback, ratings, agreed actions, signatures or sign-off.
No automatic submission
Drafts are editable preparation. The doctor decides what is accurate and what, if anything, should be copied to an official system.
No patient data
Saved career records describe what exists and where authorised evidence lives. They are not for patient-level audit data, case narratives, colleague details or identifiable clinical information. Assessment notes stay browser-local and identifier warnings are not a guarantee of anonymisation.
Goal research is a draft
Suggested actions, dates and sources may be incomplete or wrong. Confirm them against current official guidance and local requirements before relying on them.
A difference is not an underpayment finding
The free check calculates supported basic pay and shows other recognised payslip lines with their assessment boundary. It does not prove that the whole payslip is correct, that payroll made an error or that money is owed.
The demo uses example records
No real documents are accepted or saved in the public demo. Alex’s records and results exist only to show how the service works.
No silent inbox scanning
Email-assisted capture would begin with messages a doctor forwards or deliberately selects. Every suggested event, receipt or record requires confirmation.
Medical briefs are education, not guidance
Doctor’s Brief links to original sources, states its scope and separates evidence from UK decision status. It does not give patient-specific advice or prescribing instructions.
A contact request is not marketing consent
Legacy contact forms create pending, unverified requests only. It is not treated as a verified lead or used for marketing unless a future double-opt-in confirmation is completed.
Your information