Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMRCPMRCS

Embryology and congenital abnormalities

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Explain how folding, neurulation, pharyngeal development, gut rotation and septation create adult relationships and predictable congenital patterns without reducing development to isolated lists.

  • Embryology answers should state the normal sequence, the disrupted step and the resulting anatomical consequence; naming a gestational week alone does not explain a malformation.
  • Neurulation converts neural plate into neural tube through shaping, bending and fusion; failure at different axial levels produces distinct open neural-tube defects.
  • The midgut normally herniates, rotates a total of about 270 degrees around the superior mesenteric artery and returns; abnormal rotation alters bowel position and mesenteric fixation.

Reasoning priorities

01
Developmental timeline

Order supplied events without relying on an isolated week number.

Use dependencies: folding precedes final gut position, herniation precedes return, and migration must occur before a derivative reaches its destination.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseReason through abnormal midgut rotation

A supplied embryology diagram shows the midgut loop herniating around the SMA, but on return the expected total counterclockwise rotation and broad mesenteric fixation do not occur; the small bowel remains predominantly right-sided and colon left-sided.

  1. Identify the normal starting event: physiological midgut herniation with cranial and caudal limbs arranged around the SMA axis.
  2. Compare the supplied return with the normal total rotation of about 270 degrees counterclockwise when viewed anteriorly.
  3. Trace the anatomical result: atypical bowel position and a potentially narrow mesenteric attachment rather than normal broad fixation.
  4. Conclude that the diagram represents intestinal malrotation anatomy and explains susceptibility to volvulus, but does not prove current ischaemia or obstruction.
  5. Verify by following the duodenojejunal region, caecal position and mesenteric vessel relationship on appropriate imaging rather than relying on one organ position.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status7 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom