Synopsis
Match lesion, timing, anatomy and patient goals to the safest durable valve intervention through a Heart Team.
- Symptoms, ventricular response and lesion severity drive intervention; age alone never establishes an indication.
- For severe aortic stenosis, NICE favours SAVR in people under 75 who are low surgical risk and TAVI in people 75 or older or at high surgical risk when both are suitable; anatomy, life expectancy and preference can change the choice.
- TAVI is offered when surgery is unsuitable and transfemoral anatomy is feasible; surgery remains important for bicuspid anatomy, aortopathy, endocarditis or disease needing concomitant CABG/other valve repair.
- Durable surgical mitral repair is preferred over replacement for suitable severe primary mitral regurgitation.
- Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an option for symptomatic severe primary MR when surgery is unsuitable and anatomy is suitable; secondary MR requires optimised HF therapy and specialist selection.
- Transcatheter tricuspid intervention is anatomy- and centre-dependent; NICE procedural governance and a specialist Heart Team are required.
- The intervention decision must include frailty, cognition, renal/lung disease, rehabilitation potential, expected survival, durability, pacemaker risk, access route and the person's priorities.
- A technically successful procedure still needs baseline imaging, antithrombotic planning, endocarditis advice and lifelong surveillance.
Key red flags
Exertional breathlessness, angina, presyncope/syncope or heart failure with severe valve obstruction warrants prompt intervention review.
Pulmonary oedema or shock after papillary-muscle/chordal rupture, endocarditis or aortic dissection needs emergency surgical/structural assessment.