Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLAMRCSMRCGP

Surgical examination and procedural communication

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Perform a focused surgical examination and communicate a proposed procedure through indication, anatomy, alternatives, material risks, consent checks and safe escalation.

  • Identify immediate postoperative or surgical danger before a station sequence: shock, airway compromise, sepsis, bleeding, threatened limb or rapidly worsening pain needs urgent action.
  • Explain the examination and exposure, ask about pain and mobility, gain consent, offer an appropriate chaperone and avoid manipulating a wound, drain or tender area without purpose.
  • Inspect before palpation and describe scars, wounds, stomas, lumps, pulses and regional findings anatomically; infer the likely operation or pathology only after description.

Reasoning priorities

01
Focused physiological assessment

Identify instability and determine whether examination or procedure planning can safely continue.

Use current observations and trajectory; a normal value earlier in the shift does not settle a new pain, bleeding or perfusion concern.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseAssess a painful postoperative leg

A fictional postoperative case supplies escalating calf pain, a cool foot, delayed capillary refill, reduced sensation and weaker arterial Doppler signals than the other side.

  1. Stop a routine wound-focused examination, obtain full observations, keep the limb protected and call for urgent senior surgical or vascular assessment because perfusion may be threatened.
  2. Verify and document the supplied neurovascular abnormalities by side, including temperature, refill, sensation, movement and arterial signals, without repeated painful manipulation.
  3. Form a threatened-limb syndrome while retaining arterial compromise, compartment-related pressure and other postoperative mechanisms; avoid waiting for a perfect diagnostic label before escalation.
  4. Communicate operation context if known, onset, trajectory, analgesia, observations and exact comparative findings, then follow the urgent local assessment pathway.
  5. Confirm that responsibility has been accepted, explain urgency to the patient in plain language and seek feedback on whether escalation occurred before unnecessary station manoeuvres.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom