Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLAMSRAMRCP

A structured approach to medical imaging

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Select, inspect and interpret common imaging safely, integrating technical adequacy, anatomy, clinical probability and explicit follow-up rather than treating the report as an isolated answer.

  • Start with identity, date, modality, body region, projection or phase and comparison studies; an image belonging to the wrong person or episode cannot answer the question.
  • Define the clinical question before inspecting abnormalities, because modality, protocol and pre-test probability determine what a negative or positive study can mean.
  • Judge technical adequacy before interpretation: coverage, positioning, exposure, motion, contrast timing and artefact can conceal disease or simulate it.

Reasoning priorities

01
Clinical question and prior probability

Define the diagnosis or decision the image should address and identify time-critical alternatives.

A focused question lets the radiologist choose protocol and determines whether a negative result reduces probability enough to stop or requires another test.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseA discordant chest radiograph

A 71-year-old develops sudden pleuritic pain and hypoxaemia. A portable AP chest radiograph is labelled “no focal consolidation”; pulmonary embolism remains clinically plausible.

  1. Verify identity, timing, AP projection and image quality, then inspect lungs, pleura, mediastinum, bones and devices systematically rather than equating no consolidation with no acute disease.
  2. Represent the question as acute hypoxaemia with pleuritic pain and a radiograph that lacks an alternative explanation; the study was not designed to exclude pulmonary embolism.
  3. Reassess physiology and calculate the NICE two-level pulmonary embolism Wells score. If PE is likely, arrange immediate CTPA, or assess suitability for V/Q imaging when contrast allergy, severe renal impairment or high radiation risk changes the choice; follow the NICE interim anticoagulation pathway if imaging cannot be obtained immediately.
  4. Read and act on the definitive report, record the decision and contingency, and verify that any recommended imaging or treatment decision has an identified owner before transfer.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom