Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLAMRCPMRCS

Medical microbiology

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Relate microbial structure, replication and transmission to specimen choice, laboratory detection, antimicrobial susceptibility, infection prevention and clinically useful result interpretation.

  • Begin with syndrome, anatomical site, host and exposure; organism lists without these anchors generate poor specimens and misleading positives.
  • Collect the right specimen from the infected compartment, in adequate volume, before antimicrobials when safe, using correct transport and clear clinical details.
  • Microscopy is rapid but variably sensitive; culture recovers viable organisms; antigen and nucleic-acid tests detect targets that may persist without viable infection.

Reasoning priorities

01
Direct microscopy and staining

Provide rapid cellular and morphological evidence from an appropriate specimen.

Organism burden, specimen quality and observer skill affect sensitivity; morphology guides but rarely completes species-level identification.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseInterpret possible blood-culture contamination

Inputs: one of four bottles grows coagulase-negative staphylococci at 38 hours; the patient is improving, has no intravascular device, and repeat cultures before further antibiotics remain negative.

  1. Assess organism and compartment: coagulase-negative staphylococci can cause bloodstream infection but commonly enter cultures from skin during collection.
  2. Weight pattern and host evidence: one late-positive bottle, no device, improving physiology and negative repeat sets lower the probability of true sustained bacteraemia.
  3. Check sampling quality, exact species, susceptibility, collection sites and whether antibiotics preceded repeats before final interpretation.
  4. Conclude that contamination is more likely than bloodstream infection in this stated scenario, while retaining reassessment if fever, repeated concordant growth or a device emerges.
  5. Use antimicrobial review to avoid unnecessary continuation while ensuring the original clinical syndrome has another adequate explanation.
  6. Verify through trajectory and repeat evidence: continued recovery without concordant cultures supports contamination; deterioration or repeated same-organism growth reverses the judgement and prompts source evaluation.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status6 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom