Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLASJTMSRAMRCP

Patient safety and human factors

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Recognise how people, tasks, tools, environment and organisation interact, apply controls to immediate risk, and learn from incidents through proportionate system-based responses.

  • Patient safety incidents arise from interactions across a work system; look beyond the last person who touched the process to understand why harm became possible.
  • Human performance varies with fatigue, workload, interruption, unfamiliarity and competing goals; design checks and escalation around this predictable variability.
  • When risk is immediate, make the patient safe first, call for help, preserve essential evidence and communicate openly through local procedures.

Reasoning priorities

01
Immediate safety assessment

Identify current patient harm, ongoing exposure and anyone else at risk.

Stabilise, stop the hazardous process and escalate clinically before beginning a detailed investigation.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseWrong-concentration near miss

A nurse notices that a look-alike ampoule of a higher concentration has been selected immediately before administration; no drug reaches the patient.

  1. Stop administration, confirm the patient is unharmed, secure the ampoule and prescription details, inform the responsible clinician and manage any continuing stock risk immediately.
  2. Record factual chronology and report the near miss, including location, workload, storage, packaging, electronic display and how the discrepancy was detected.
  3. Map defences: selection, preparation and check stages; identify why the wrong item was easy to choose and why the final check succeeded this time.
  4. Implement an owned control such as physical separation or purchasing and system constraints, then audit selection errors and staff workarounds to verify risk reduction without delaying urgent care.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status3 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom