Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Lung nodules, masses and mediastinal widening

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
A widened mediastinum can mark vascular injury

Acute severe chest or back pain, pulse or neurological deficit, trauma or shock with mediastinal abnormality requires urgent assessment for acute aortic syndrome or haemorrhage.

Action: Stabilise physiology, call senior trauma or vascular help and obtain the appropriate immediate contrast CT pathway when the patient is stable enough; do not use a normal or equivocal radiograph to exclude vascular injury.

Synopsis

Characterise focal lung and mediastinal abnormalities, distinguish an incidental nodule from suspected cancer or vascular emergency and create an owned CT, referral or tissue pathway.

  • Describe a focal lung lesion by size, number, density, margin, calcification, cavitation, growth and relation to pleura, airway, hila and vessels; compare every useful prior study.
  • A mass or chest radiograph suspicious for lung cancer enters an urgent cancer pathway; contrast-enhanced CT of chest, lower neck, liver and adrenals should precede biopsy planning.
  • Mediastinal widening is non-specific and projection sensitive, yet radiography cannot exclude acute aortic injury: pursue urgent CT when symptoms, trauma or physiology make the diagnosis consequential.

Key red flags

A new spiculated mass, hilar enlargement, lobar collapse, pleural nodularity or destructive bone change requires prompt suspected-cancer action.

Mediastinal widening on a rotated AP portable radiograph may be technical, but compatible acute pain, trauma or shock still mandates definitive vascular imaging.

Haemoptysis, weight loss, persistent cough or recurrent same-site pneumonia increases concern even when a radiographic lesion is subtle.

A pulmonary nodule in a person under 18, with known cancer, immunosuppression or suspected infection does not fit routine adult incidental-nodule algorithms.

Any recommended surveillance scan needs a named owner and fail-safe system; an interval written in a report is not follow-up by itself.

Mass and obstructive signs

Spiculation, hilar mass, bronchial cutoff, lobar collapse, persistent focal consolidation or nodal enlargement raises suspected lung cancer and prompts referral.

Acute vascular context

Tearing pain, trauma, pulse inequality, neurological deficit, hypotension or pleural blood with mediastinal change requires urgent contrast CT and specialist escalation.

Investigation priorities

01
Thin-section chest CTFirst step

Characterise a radiographic nodule or mass and define size, density, margins, growth, airways, nodes and pleura.

Management branches

Worked case: new hilar massMove from radiograph to diagnosis and stage

A smoker with weight loss has a chest radiograph showing a new spiculated hilar mass and lobar collapse.

  1. Communicate the suspicious finding and enter the suspected lung-cancer pathway rather than arranging unowned routine follow-up.
  2. Obtain contrast-enhanced CT of chest, lower neck, liver and adrenals before biopsy to map tumour, nodes, metastases and a safe target.
Incidental noduleApply a population-matched pathway

A small pulmonary nodule is found incidentally on CT in an otherwise stable adult.

Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status7 sources · checked 13 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 13 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom