Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Stenting as bridge or palliation

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Select appropriate malignant colonic obstruction for stenting, explain the different aims of a bridge and palliation, and recognise when failure requires urgent surgical treatment.

  • Reserve a colonic stent for symptomatic, radiologically confirmed malignant obstruction after assessment excludes perforation and other reasons for immediate surgery.
  • Discuss bridging stenting alongside emergency resection for suitable potentially curable left-sided colon cancer; include perforation, failure, stoma and oncological trade-offs.
  • Palliative stenting is often preferred for a suitable malignant obstruction, but new severe pain, guarding or shock after placement demands urgent assessment for perforation.

Key red flags

Reasons to choose immediate surgery

Perforation, peritonitis, systemic toxicity or convincing bowel infarction makes routine stenting inappropriate. A stent does not remove gangrenous bowel or control faecal contamination. Escalate urgently when these features emerge before or after the procedure.

Investigation priorities

01
Contrast-enhanced CT before stentingFirst step

Confirm malignant obstruction and decide whether the anatomy and bowel condition support stent placement.

Management branches

Candidate selectionMake the intent and rescue route explicit

A patient has symptomatic malignant large-bowel obstruction being considered for a stent.

  1. Review contrast CT and the patient together. Exclude perforation, peritonitis and convincing ischaemia or systemic deterioration that requires surgery; do not insert a prophylactic stent into an asymptomatic narrowing.
  2. For a suitable stable patient, agree whether the purpose is a bridge or palliation and discuss alternatives with the colorectal team. Include technical failure, perforation, emergency surgery and the possibility of a stoma before the procedure begins.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status3 sources · checked 8 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 8 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom