Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
2 min synopsisUK scopeSources checked 27 Aug 2026Clinical review pending
!
Immediate danger or serious injury
Airway compromise, shock, altered consciousness, severe burns, head or abdominal injury, poisoning, sepsis, strangulation signs, acute sexual assault, a child unsafe to leave, or an adult at immediate risk requires simultaneous emergency medical and safeguarding action.
Action: Stabilise first, obtain senior paediatric or emergency help, preserve necessary evidence without withholding care, contact the named safeguarding team and emergency services or social care according to risk, and do not discharge until an explicit safe plan and responsible professional are documented.
Synopsis
Recognise skin findings that merit safeguarding consideration, stabilise medical emergencies, document neutrally, distinguish important mimics, and use proportionate child and adult protection pathways without claiming that morphology proves causation.
A skin finding can raise concern but rarely establishes cause by itself; combine morphology with development, mechanism, timing, health history, behaviour and wider examination.
Any unexplained bruise in a baby who is not independently mobile is uncommon and needs prompt paediatric assessment, while concern is not the same as a concluded diagnosis of abuse.
Protected-site, patterned, clustered or unusually numerous bruises and an account inconsistent with the child's abilities increase concern and justify escalation.
Key red flags
Bruising in a non-mobile infant, patterned or clustered injury, burns with clear demarcation or immersion distribution, injury to protected sites, multiple injuries of different apparent ages, an implausible or changing account, delay in seeking care, disclosure, coercive behaviour, unsafe discharge or serious medical symptoms warrants prompt senior safeguarding assessment.
Immediate safety signal
A direct disclosure, threatening accompanying person, strangulation symptom, unsafe home plan or serious associated injury requires action even if the skin finding itself is non-specific.
Investigation priorities
01
Head-to-toe clinical assessmentFirst step
Treat illness and identify the full injury and medical-differential pattern.
Management branches
First-line responseTreat, listen, document and escalate
A skin finding or account creates reasonable safeguarding concern without an immediate resuscitation emergency.
Treat pain and illness, speak with the child or adult safely, use open prompts and record spontaneous words verbatim without seeking a detailed investigative narrative.
Perform the minimum necessary systematic examination with consent, assent and a chaperone and document objective measurements and a medical differential.
National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.
Working Together to Safeguard ChildrenCurrent statutory multi-agency assessment, information sharing, referral and professional responsibility in England.
RCPCH Child Protection EvidenceSystematic evidence on bruising, burns, oral injury, bites, fractures and differential interpretation.