Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLASJTMSRAMRCPMRCGP

Confidentiality and information sharing

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Share the right patient information with the right recipient for a justified purpose, distinguishing professional confidentiality, common-law duties and data-protection bases while documenting proportionate decisions and protecting people from harm.

  • Confidentiality is not absolute and information sharing is not automatically a breach. Identify the purpose, recipient, authority, necessity and minimum information needed before disclosing.
  • For direct care, share relevant, accurate and current information within the care team in line with reasonable patient expectations unless the patient objects; explain the consequences of an objection and seek a workable compromise.
  • Do not confuse consent under the common-law duty of confidence with a UK GDPR lawful basis. Health data processing normally needs both an Article 6 basis and an Article 9 condition, which may be provisions other than consent.

Reasoning priorities

01
Purpose and recipient check

Define why information is needed and who will receive it.

Verify identity and role independently, especially for remote requests. A clear purpose determines relevance, legal authority, patient expectations and the secure route.

Worked reasoning

Worked casePatient objects to direct-care sharing

A patient with capacity refuses permission to share a serious drug reaction with a specialist who would prescribe related treatment; the information is essential to safe referral.

  1. Clarify exactly what the patient objects to and why, explain who would receive the information and how it prevents foreseeable treatment harm.
  2. Explore a proportionate compromise, such as sharing only the reaction, severity and relevant treatment context through the secure referral route.
  3. If the patient maintains the objection, explain that safe referral or treatment may be impossible without the essential information; do not promise unsafe secrecy.
  4. Final action: agree the safe route the patient accepts, or decline to arrange care that requires undisclosed essential information while offering alternatives.
  5. Verification: document the objection, consequences, compromise considered and plan, and ensure any permitted disclosure reached the intended clinical recipient.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom