01OverviewDefinition, clinical context and the essential points that orientate the chapter.
Ask exactly which movement hurts. Mechanical risk is signalled by pain on first standing, single-leg loading, turning in bed, rising from a chair or rotating the limb, not merely a high background pain score. Establish trajectory, radiotherapy timing, systemic response and any crack or sudden loss of confidence. Record walking aids, falls, pre-morbid function and the activity that the patient hopes surgery will restore. Define prognosis collaboratively rather than using one oncological estimate in isolation.
Observe transfers rather than asking the patient to perform a dangerous stress test. Inspect alignment, swelling, skin and previous incisions and palpate gently along the whole bone. Assess adjacent joints and distal motor, sensory and vascular function. Do not apply torsional examination to a large peritrochanteric lytic lesion. Give a frame, crutches or bed-to-chair restriction immediately when ordinary loading reproduces focal pain and communicate that instruction to every team.
Obtain full-length orthogonal radiographs and compare previous studies for progression or recalcification. Describe lytic, mixed or blastic character, location, longitudinal size, cortical breach and whether the lesion reaches a joint or implant. CT provides cross-sectional measurement of remaining cortex and three-dimensional geometry. MRI identifies marrow length, soft-tissue extension and a stress reaction or occult fracture, while bone scan or PET shows distribution rather than local strength.
Mirels adds one to three points for upper versus lower versus peritrochanteric site, mild versus moderate versus functional pain, blastic versus mixed versus lytic pattern and less than one-third, one-third to two-thirds or more than two-thirds diameter involvement. A score of nine or above was proposed for fixation, eight is a difficult intermediate zone and seven or below often supports observation. Sensitivity and specificity are imperfect, especially around size estimation and subjective pain.
Specialist assessment therefore overlays the score with CT cortical involvement, lesion length, axial location, primary histology, expected treatment response, current systemic control and likely survival. Quantitative CT rigidity analysis and finite-element methods can improve prediction where available, but they are not universal first-line services. Functional pain in a lytic peritrochanteric lesion may justify surgery below a rigid threshold, while a stable blastic lesion in a rapidly deteriorating patient may not benefit despite a score.
Confirm diagnosis before instrumentation. Widespread radiographically concordant disease with established cancer histology may proceed without new tissue. A solitary lesion, no known primary or atypical imaging needs systemic staging and specialist-planned core biopsy. Never assume a sarcoma is a metastasis and pass a nail through the entire medullary canal. Biopsy and definitive reconstruction are planned by the team that would perform oncological resection if pathology proves unexpected.
Select reconstruction from anatomy. Cephalomedullary nailing can protect a peritrochanteric and subtrochanteric segment when sufficient proximal and distal bone remains. Cement fills defects and shares immediate load but does not control tumour. Plate fixation can address selected metaphyseal or periarticular lesions but requires durable purchase. Extensive femoral-head, neck or proximal-femoral destruction often favours arthroplasty or modular endoprosthesis, which bypasses diseased bone and permits immediate loading.
Coordinate timing with oncology and anaesthesia. Embolise selected hypervascular renal or thyroid lesions before surgery. Prepare blood, VTE prophylaxis and postoperative loading and arrange radiotherapy after wound review when indicated. If surgery is disproportionate, use explicit load restriction, aids, analgesia and radiotherapy with close reassessment. The decision is revisited if pain becomes functional, cortex worsens or systemic therapy extends survival.
Key points
- Functional pain during weight bearing or transfer is the most important bedside warning of impending long-bone failure and should trigger immediate load protection.
- First-line imaging is full-length radiography in two planes; CT is the preferred structural adjunct for circumferential cortical loss and operative geometry.
- Mirels scores site, pain, lytic character and lesion size from one to three each; a total of nine or more historically supports fixation consideration.
- Use Mirels as decision support, not an automatic rule: intermediate scores, lesion geometry, CT cortex, tumour response, survival and patient goals require specialist judgement.
- MRI answers occult fracture and marrow or soft-tissue extent; it does not measure everyday torsional strength by itself.
- Protect weight bearing while the plan is made, because radiotherapy and antiresorptive treatment cannot immediately rebuild critically absent cortex.
- Prophylactic fixation generally permits easier surgery and earlier function than reconstruction after a complete fracture when risk and prognosis justify intervention.
- Choose nail, plate, cement augmentation or endoprosthetic replacement to bypass the entire mechanically relevant lesion and remain durable without depending on union.
02AetiologyUnderlying causes, associations and risk factors, with why each one matters.
Lytic metastatic remodelling
Tumour-driven osteoclast activity removes cortex faster than repair can replace it, progressively narrowing the section that resists bending and torsion.
High-load anatomical site
Peritrochanteric femur and lower-limb shafts experience large cyclical moments, making a similar lesion more consequential than one in a lightly loaded region.
Treatment-related weakening
Radiotherapy, previous curettage, stress risers, osteoporosis and systemic therapy can reduce bone reserve around the tumour and proposed implant.
Survival-linked fatigue exposure
Longer survival permits more load cycles and tumour progression, so a marginal construct or untreated lesion has more time to fail.
03PathophysiologyThe causal sequence from the underlying abnormality to symptoms and harm.
- 1Loss of cortical circumference
Bending stiffness falls steeply as tumour destroys the outer cortical shell, so circumferential and axial involvement matter more than diameter alone.
- 2Functional microfracture pain
Pain during loading reflects microscopic cortical failure and periosteal strain, often preceding the radiographic line of a completed fracture.
- 3Torsional vulnerability
Eccentric defects concentrate shear during turning and transfers, explaining why a patient can fracture without a fall or major axial force.
- 4Radiotherapy time lag
Radiation can control tumour and later permit recalcification, but early cortical strength remains inadequate during the biological response interval.
- 5Construct load dependence
Fixation must carry immediate physiological force because tumour, radiation and systemic illness may prevent reliable union across the lesion.
04Clinical features and red flagsSymptoms, examination findings, patterns of presentation and time-critical warnings.
Pain during standing, turning or transfer indicates load-induced microfailure and deserves more weight than rest pain alone.
A defect in this high-moment region combines poor material with demanding geometry and carries particular completion risk.
Large axial and circumferential destruction on CT leaves inadequate shell to resist bending and torsion even without a fracture line.
Increasing lesion size or load pain after radiation shows that mechanical risk remains active despite attempted tumour control.
Sudden symptom escalation with marrow oedema or a subtle cortical break means structural failure has already begun.
Renal or thyroid origin and avid enhancement predicts bleeding that can be reduced by planned angiography and embolisation.
05InvestigationsWhat to request, why it matters and how to interpret it.
Read from the initial assessment onwards. Tests may run in parallel in urgent care; first-line, preferred, confirmatory, definitive and gold-standard labels appear only when the chapter explicitly states them.
- 01
First-line full-length radiographsFirst stepFirst line - Why
- Establish lesion phenotype, longitudinal extent, cortical destruction, fracture and relation to joints or existing implants.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Apply Mirels components cautiously and compare serially; no visible fracture line is required for clinically important risk.
- 02
CT cortical assessment - Why
- Quantify circumferential loss, define residual fixation corridors and plan cement, nail, plate or replacement geometry.
- Interpretation and limitations
- This is the preferred structural adjunct to radiographs and often changes judgement in an intermediate Mirels lesion.
- 03
MRI for occult failure and extent - Why
- Identify a stress fracture, marrow length, soft-tissue mass and neurovascular or joint proximity.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Use when symptoms exceed radiographic findings or tumour extent influences reconstruction; MRI signal alone is not a validated strength threshold.
- 04
Systemic staging and histology review - Why
- Confirm primary cancer, disease burden, treatment options and whether a solitary lesion needs tissue.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Uncertain or discordant disease requires biopsy before fixation; widespread concordant metastases may not need repeat sampling.
- 05
Quantitative CT rigidity analysis when available - Why
- Estimate change in axial, bending and torsional rigidity compared with expected normal bone.
- Interpretation and limitations
- This can refine difficult risk decisions but availability is limited and results remain part of multidisciplinary judgement.
06Differential diagnosisRealistic alternatives and the features that help distinguish them.
Established occult fracture
A subtle cortical break or marrow fracture may already exist despite no deformity, shifting the plan from pure prophylaxis to fracture reconstruction.
Primary bone sarcoma
Solitary aggressive disease without secure carcinoma histology requires specialist biopsy planning before instrumentation contaminates the canal.
Avascular necrosis or arthritis
Groin pain on loading can arise from head collapse or joint degeneration; imaging must attribute symptoms before prophylactic shaft fixation.
Referred spinal pain
Radicular or spinal metastatic pain may be felt in the limb without local mechanical failure and needs neurological examination and MRI when indicated.
Insufficiency or atypical fracture
Osteoporosis, radiation and antiresorptive exposure can produce stress failure outside tumour, changing biopsy, implant and metabolic-bone decisions.
07ManagementImmediate care, first-line treatment, alternatives and escalation.
01Immediate protectionStop the lesion completingFirst stepFunctional pain or imaging indicates a high-load cortex may fail during ordinary activity.+
- 1Prescribe explicit protected or non-weight bearing and provide a safe aid before further transfers.
- 2Obtain full-length radiographs and urgent CT, adding MRI for occult fracture or uncertain extent.
- 3Document skin and distal neurovascular findings and repeat them after any sudden symptom change.
- 4EscalationEscalate loss of alignment or a crack as completed fracture rather than continuing score-based observation.
02Risk integrationUse Mirels without surrendering judgementA metastatic long-bone lesion has not yet completed a fracture.+
- 1Record each Mirels component separately so site, functional pain, lesion character and estimated size remain visible.
- 2Add CT cortex, lesion length, primary biology, radiotherapy response, survival and patient goals.
- 3Seek orthopaedic oncology review for a score near the treatment boundary or any discordant high-risk feature.
- 4Reassess after systemic or radiation treatment because both symptoms and cortex can improve or worsen over time.
03Prophylactic surgeryCreate durable load-bearing capacityPredicted fracture harm exceeds operative burden and useful function is achievable.+
- 1Confirm histology or perform planned biopsy first when disease is solitary, atypical or not previously diagnosed.
- 2Choose an implant or replacement that bypasses all critical disease and does not depend on tumour-bone union.
- 3Plan embolisation and blood availability for hypervascular deposits and coordinate anaesthetic and VTE strategy.
- 4Mobilise to the prescribed load early and arrange adjuvant radiotherapy after wound assessment.
04Non-operativeMake observation mechanically explicitSurgery is not indicated because risk is lower, treatment may restore bone or burden exceeds likely benefit.+
- 1State permitted loading, equipment, transfer method and who will reassess rather than writing mobilise as able.
- 2Deliver radiotherapy, systemic treatment and bone-modifying therapy according to oncology indications.
- 3Review functional pain and interval radiographs or CT at a timeframe proportionate to risk.
- 4Reopen the fixation decision immediately for new transfer pain, cortical progression or improved survival prospects.
Key medicines and prescribing safety2 treatments · regimens, roles and cautions+
Paracetamol during protected mobilisation
Use 500 to 1,000 mg orally when required with at least four hours between doses, limiting total intake to 4 g daily and reducing the ceiling in low weight, malnutrition or liver disease.Check all combination products and alcohol exposure; pain masking must never be used as evidence that a structurally weak limb can bear full weight.
Low-molecular-weight heparin when VTE assessment supports it
Use the locally approved prophylactic regimen according to body weight, renal function, platelet history, bleeding risk and planned neuraxial or operative timing.Coordinate withholding and restarting around biopsy, embolisation and surgery; monitor bleeding and platelets as indicated and do not prescribe a generic dose in severe renal impairment.
08ComplicationsImportant consequences, why they occur and why they matter clinically.
Completed pathological fracture
Delay converts a controlled elective reconstruction into painful emergency surgery with greater bleeding, immobility and perioperative morbidity.
Implant fatigue failure
An undersized or poorly anchored construct can break when progressive tumour and absent union leave it carrying every load cycle.
Peri-implant progression
Untreated tumour beyond fixation or delayed radiotherapy can erode remaining bone, loosen screws and create a new fracture at the construct end.
Operative embolic and bleeding harm
Intramedullary instrumentation increases physiological load, while hypervascular deposits can cause major operative haemorrhage without adequate preoperative planning.
Unnecessary surgery
Over-reliance on a score can expose a stable lesion and a frail dying patient to infection, thrombosis and rehabilitation burden without functional benefit.
09Monitoring and follow-upTreatment response, safety checks and longer-term review.
- Ask about pain during standing, turning and transfers daily when an inpatient lesion remains unfixed.
- Check that ward, therapy and transport staff can see the exact loading restriction and use the correct aid.
- Repeat radiographs or CT after local or systemic therapy when the result will change load or fixation decisions.
- After prophylactic surgery, follow blood loss, wound, VTE, implant alignment and immediate functional loading.
- Ensure postoperative radiotherapy and oncology follow-up are booked rather than left as an unspecified recommendation.
- Recalculate benefit when systemic response or decline changes survival, goals or ability to rehabilitate.
10Special situationsVariants, exceptions and circumstances that change the usual approach.
Functional pain is biomechanical data
A reproducible symptom during transfer reveals failure under real load and should not be averaged into a generic pain score.
Mirels exposes components
Its best value is structuring conversation about site, pain, lysis and size rather than delivering an automatic operation.
CT sees the remaining shell
Cross-sectional cortex can reveal severe circumferential loss hidden by overlapping structures on a plain radiograph.
Prophylaxis avoids fracture biology
Operating before displacement generally reduces pain, blood loss and hospital burden and enables earlier rehabilitation.
Cement shares but does not cure
Polymethylmethacrylate supplies immediate support yet needs tumour control and an implant designed for ongoing disease.
Observation is an active plan
Safe non-operative care specifies loading, equipment, review interval and symptoms that immediately reopen the surgical decision.
11Common pitfallsFrequent interpretation and management errors.
- 01
Treating Mirels nine as a mandatory operation or Mirels seven as proof of safety.
- 02
Ignoring functional pain because there is no complete fracture line on the radiograph.
- 03
Sending a critically weakened proximal femur to radiotherapy without protected loading and orthopaedic review.
- 04
Passing a prophylactic nail through a solitary lesion before histology is secure.
- 05
Choosing a construct that requires union or fails to bypass the full mechanically relevant disease.
- 06
Writing partial weight bearing without checking whether frailty, pain or cognition makes the instruction achievable.