Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Brain metastases

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Symptomatic metastasis with mass effect

Falling consciousness, new pupil abnormality, rapidly worsening focal deficit, seizure without recovery or severe vomiting may reflect oedema, haemorrhage, hydrocephalus or herniation from metastatic disease.

Action: Stabilise airway, breathing and circulation, treat an active seizure, obtain urgent CT and contact neurosurgery and oncology; local therapy for symptomatic disease should not be deferred while waiting for systemic treatment to work.

Synopsis

Recognise brain metastases and acute mass effect, investigate intracranial and extracranial disease, and reason through systemic therapy, surgery, stereotactic treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy and supportive care using patient-specific factors.

  • Brain metastases are secondary tumours arriving mainly by the bloodstream; common primaries include lung, breast, melanoma, renal and gastrointestinal cancers, but any cancer history must be interpreted with the scan and current pathology.
  • Symptoms reflect lesion location, number, haemorrhage, oedema and CSF obstruction; a patient can have a solitary dominant lesion or numerous small metastases.
  • Symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy when appropriate regardless of systemic therapy; urgent mass effect needs immediate neurosurgical and oncological assessment.

Key red flags

New focal deficit, seizure, cognitive change, gait dysfunction or persistent headache in a person with current or previous cancer.

Falling consciousness, pupil change, repeated vomiting or rapid motor decline indicating mass effect or acute haemorrhage.

A solitary or dominant large lesion with oedema and mass effect that may benefit from surgical decompression and tissue diagnosis.

New neurological symptoms during surveillance after treatment, which require clinical review and appropriate imaging rather than waiting for the next scheduled visit.

Back pain, radicular symptoms, sphincter change or limb weakness suggesting separate spinal metastatic disease or cord compression.

Leptomeningeal symptoms such as multifocal cranial neuropathies, radicular pain or widespread neurological deficits, which follow a different investigation and treatment pathway.

Seizure and recovery

Characterise focal onset, duration, recurrence and residual deficit. Ongoing seizure or incomplete recovery requires emergency treatment and imaging, while a recovered first seizure still needs prompt structural evaluation.

Pressure and haemorrhage

Progressive headache, vomiting, drowsiness, papilloedema or pupil change can reflect oedema or hydrocephalus; abrupt severe symptoms may indicate intratumoural haemorrhage.

Investigation priorities

01
Urgent non-contrast CT headFirst step

Detect haemorrhage, hydrocephalus, major oedema and mass effect rapidly in an acutely deteriorating patient.

Management branches

Symptomatic local-therapy pathwayLarge solitary metastasis with mass effect

A patient with cancer develops progressive hemiparesis and MRI shows one accessible large lesion with substantial oedema.

  1. Assess emergency pressure signs, seizure, function and reversibility, and involve neurosurgery, radiation oncology and the primary-tumour team promptly.
  2. Review extracranial control, performance status, lesion location and operative risk while treating acute symptoms; symptomatic disease should not wait for systemic therapy alone.
Systemic-integration pathwayMultiple metastases without acute mass effect

MRI shows several lesions in a person who is stable enough for full multidisciplinary selection.

Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 13 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 13 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom