Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
QuestionsFlashcardsBriefsDashboardAccount
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

← Obstetrics and gynaecology indexChapter sections
OverviewAetiologyPathophysiologyClinical features and red flagsInvestigationsDifferential diagnosisManagementComplicationsMonitoring and follow-upSpecial situationsCommon pitfallsQuestionsSources
Full textbook13 sectionsOpen only what you need
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Obstetrics and gynaecology · UK scope · Sources checked 7 Sept 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Reduced movements or systemic illness

In a pregnancy affected by cholestasis, reduced fetal movements need immediate maternity assessment; severe abdominal pain, vomiting, jaundice or confusion may indicate another hepatic emergency.

Action: Contact maternity triage immediately for reduced movements or acute maternal illness, assess maternal observations and fetal wellbeing, and obtain urgent liver, renal, glucose and coagulation tests when systemic features are present.

Overview

Assess pregnancy-related itch using bile acids and competing diagnoses, then individualise symptom relief, surveillance and birth timing according to fetal risk.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a reversible pregnancy-associated disturbance of bile handling. The usual presentation is itch without a primary rash, sometimes worse at night and on the hands or feet, although symptoms may be generalised. Scratch marks are secondary damage and do not exclude cholestasis. The diagnostic task combines symptoms, raised total bile acids and exclusion of competing explanations; an elevated alanine aminotransferase alone does not quantify fetal risk. A normal initial blood result cannot end the assessment when the itch continues, because biochemical change may lag behind symptoms.

Risk communication should distinguish maternal discomfort from fetal risk. Severe itch can profoundly affect sleep without implying severe biochemical disease, while substantial bile acid elevation may occur in someone whose symptoms seem manageable. Ask about prior cholestasis, family history, gallstones, other liver disease, new medicines, dark urine, pale stools and systemic symptoms. Examine the skin for eczema, urticaria, infestation or pregnancy dermatoses and record blood pressure. Investigate unusually early, severe or persistent presentations more broadly, often with hepatology support.

Aetiology

01

Pregnancy-related susceptibility

Pregnancy hormones interact with inherited variation in hepatobiliary transport, helping explain familial clustering, recurrence and the usual improvement after delivery.

02

Associated risk context

Previous cholestasis, multiple pregnancy and pre-existing hepatobiliary disease increase diagnostic suspicion, but many affected patients have no recognised prior hepatic disorder.

Pathophysiology

  1. 1
    Impaired bile transport

    Reduced hepatobiliary handling allows bile acids to accumulate in maternal blood, while symptoms may precede measurable laboratory abnormality by days or weeks.

  2. 2
    Fetal exposure

    Raised maternal bile acids alter the fetoplacental environment; fetal complications become particularly important at high peak concentrations rather than in proportion to maternal itch.

  3. 3
    Postpartum reversal

    Removal of pregnancy-related hormonal influence usually allows transport and biochemistry to recover, so persistence after the puerperium argues for a further hepatic explanation.

Clinical features and red flags

Itch without primary rash

Palmar or plantar itching and nocturnal sleep disturbance are characteristic, but distribution alone neither confirms the diagnosis nor establishes biochemical severity.

Secondary skin damage

Excoriations from scratching may be prominent; distinguish them from a primary inflammatory eruption that points towards dermatological disease.

Coexisting obstetric risk

Hypertension, diabetes or multiple pregnancy changes the assessment of fetal risk and may lead to a different birth plan from isolated singleton cholestasis.

Red flags requiring action

  • Reduced or altered fetal movements require prompt maternity assessment even when recent bile acids or fetal checks were reassuring.
  • Jaundice with vomiting, right upper quadrant pain, bleeding, hypoglycaemia or altered consciousness is atypical for straightforward cholestasis and requires urgent hospital investigation.
  • Bile acids reaching 100 micromol/L or above require specialist review of the planned birth date and coexisting risk factors.

Investigations

  1. 01
    Total serum bile acidsFirst step
    Why
    Confirm biochemical cholestasis and stratify pregnancy risk using RCOG categories.
    Interpretation and limitations
    A concentration below 19 micromol/L does not establish RCOG-defined ICP; repeat if itch persists, and retain the peak result when reviewing severity.
  2. 02
    Liver biochemistry
    Why
    Assess transaminases and bilirubin and identify patterns requiring additional investigation.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Bile acids may be raised despite normal liver enzymes; pregnancy-related alkaline phosphatase elevation makes that result less useful for isolating hepatic disease.
  3. 03
    Targeted hepatic screen and ultrasound
    Why
    Investigate atypical timing, abdominal symptoms or persistent biochemical abnormalities.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Select viral serology, autoimmune testing and biliary imaging from the history; imaging can detect obstruction but does not itself prove or exclude ICP.
  4. 04
    Coagulation profile when clinically indicated
    Why
    Assess possible vitamin K deficiency or impaired synthetic function in relevant cases.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Routine vitamin K is unnecessary for most patients; abnormal clotting, steatorrhoea or another hepatic concern requires a specific management plan.
  5. 05

Differential diagnosis

01

Dermatological itch

Eczema, urticaria, scabies and pregnancy-specific dermatoses generally have identifiable skin findings, although coexistence with biochemical cholestasis remains possible.

02

Biliary or hepatic disease

Gallstone obstruction, viral hepatitis, autoimmune disease and medicine-induced injury can produce abnormal liver tests and itch; associated symptoms and targeted testing guide distinction.

03

HELLP or acute fatty liver

Vomiting, severe pain, hypertension, haemolysis, thrombocytopenia, hypoglycaemia or coagulopathy suggest a systemic pregnancy emergency rather than isolated itchy cholestasis.

Additional chapter-specific clues

Possible alternative liver disease

Pain, fever, marked jaundice, hepatomegaly or constitutional illness requires investigation for infection, obstruction, drug injury or pregnancy liver failure.

Management

01Diagnostic assessmentInvestigate persistent pregnancy itchFirst stepA pregnant patient reports new itch without a convincing primary dermatological cause.+
  1. 1Request bile acids and liver tests, document the skin findings and review medications, previous liver disease and associated obstetric symptoms.
  2. 2Arrange repeat testing if symptoms persist despite normal results, with earlier review if jaundice, pain or systemic illness develops.
  3. 3Refer confirmed or atypical disease to obstetric care and expand the liver work-up when the clinical pattern does not fit isolated ICP.
02Symptom managementImprove comfort while explaining treatment limitsBiochemical cholestasis has been identified and itch or sleep loss is affecting quality of life.+
  1. 1Discuss cooling measures, bland emollients and a pregnancy-appropriate sedating antihistamine if sleep disruption is troublesome.

Complications

01

Preterm birth

Both spontaneous labour and planned early delivery contribute to prematurity, making neonatal implications part of counselling when a severe biochemical result changes birth timing.

02

Fetal compromise

Meconium passage and stillbirth risk matter particularly in severe disease; other pregnancy complications further alter risk beyond the bile acid concentration alone.

03

Maternal consequences

Sleep loss and excoriation can be substantial, while fat-soluble vitamin malabsorption and impaired clotting occur less often and require targeted assessment when suspected.

Monitoring and follow-up

  • Keep the peak bile acid result visible in the maternity plan and review new values together with gestation and accompanying risks.
  • Assess sleep, scratching injury and the effectiveness or adverse effects of symptom treatment rather than assuming a falling ALT means clinical recovery.
  • Ensure the patient knows to seek assessment for changed fetal movements regardless of the scheduled blood-test date.
  • At approximately six weeks after birth, check that itch has resolved and liver tests and bile acids have normalised; refer unresolved abnormalities.

Special situations

Severity is biochemical

Itch intensity correlates poorly with fetal risk, so a comfortable patient can still need a prompt change to the birth plan.

Monitoring has limits

Routine ultrasound or CTG cannot reliably predict every ICP-related adverse event; reassurance must be tied to the present assessment rather than the remainder of pregnancy.

Future pregnancy review

Recurrence is possible, so arrange baseline liver tests and bile acids early in a subsequent pregnancy and recheck promptly when symptoms recur.

Contraception after recovery

Contraceptive choice is generally unrestricted after biochemical normalisation, but new itch during an estrogen-containing preparation warrants assessment rather than automatic attribution to pregnancy history.

Common pitfalls

  1. 01

    Diagnosing cholestasis from itch alone and forgetting to reconsider a primary skin disorder or obstructed biliary system.

  2. 02

    Using ALT magnitude or symptom intensity instead of bile acids to assign RCOG fetal-risk categories.

  3. 03

    Allowing symptom improvement on ursodeoxycholic acid to cancel a previously justified discussion of planned birth.

  4. 04

    Omitting postnatal blood tests because delivery has occurred and the patient reports some improvement.

Practice

Two practice questions

Your practice draft is saved in this browser.

Question 1 of 2
0 correct
Obstetrics and gynaecologyOriginal SBA

Planning birth with moderate bile acids

A patient with an otherwise uncomplicated singleton pregnancy has a peak bile acid concentration of 72 micromol/L at 35 weeks. Which planned birth range best matches RCOG advice?

Choose one answer, then submit
← Rapid synopsisBack to overviewAll Obstetrics and gynaecology topics →
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • RCOG GTG43 intrahepatic cholestasis categories
  • RCOG intrahepatic cholestasis patient information
  • PITCHES randomised trial protocol and clinical findings
  • Ursofalk 500 mg tablets UK SmPC
  • EASL clinical practice guidance on liver disease in pregnancy

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom

The obstetric plan uses peak bile acids and modifies it for multiple pregnancy, diabetes, pre-eclampsia and other concerns. In an otherwise uncomplicated singleton pregnancy, RCOG allows consideration of birth by 40 weeks for mild disease, recommends discussion of 38–39 weeks for moderate disease and 35–36 weeks for severe disease. These are counselling ranges, not an automatic instruction for caesarean birth. Explain the reason for the proposed timing, how new blood results can change it, and the limits of fetal monitoring in predicting a sudden adverse event.

Key points

  • Suspect intrahepatic cholestasis when pregnancy itch occurs without a primary skin eruption, often affecting palms and soles.
  • Measure total bile acids and liver enzymes; persistent symptoms warrant repeat testing even when initial results are normal.
  • RCOG defines mild disease by peak bile acids 19–39 micromol/L, moderate by 40–99 and severe by 100 or more.
  • Use the highest relevant bile acid concentration and the complete pregnancy history when discussing risk and timing of birth.
  • Ursodeoxycholic acid can offer limited itch relief; it is not proven to prevent stillbirth and cannot replace a birth plan.
  • Confirm symptom and biochemical resolution after birth, and investigate persistent abnormalities rather than assuming they remain pregnancy-related.
Obstetric and fetal assessment
Why
Evaluate movements, maternal comorbidity and current fetal status when clinically indicated.
Interpretation and limitations
Additional growth scans are not required solely because of isolated ICP, and a reassuring CTG cannot guarantee protection from subsequent stillbirth.
2
Consider specialist-prescribed ursodeoxycholic acid for symptom relief after explaining its limited average effect and the absence of proven stillbirth prevention.
  • 3Repeat blood tests initially after about one week, then individualise frequency and update the documented peak bile acid category.
  • 03Birth planningBalance gestation against biochemical riskThe diagnosis is established and the patient needs an explicit plan for timing and place of birth.+
    1. 1Use RCOG singleton timing ranges with peak bile acids and adjust for diabetes, hypertension, twins or other fetal and maternal concerns.
    2. 2Discuss induction, planned caesarean where otherwise indicated and expectant care, documenting the patient’s preferences and changing risk profile.
    3. 3Give clear movement advice and arrange six-week postnatal symptom and biochemical review, including hepatology referral if recovery is incomplete.
    Key medicines and prescribing safety2 treatments · regimens, roles and cautions+
    An off-label option for pregnancy cholestasis when the patient values a possible reduction in itch.

    Ursodeoxycholic acid

    A UK trial regimen started at 500 mg orally twice daily, with clinician titration according to response; prescribe and stop after birth through the obstetric plan.

    Do not present the PITCHES regimen as a licensed ICP dose or claim it prevents stillbirth; review diarrhoea, interactions and the specific product information.

    Provides comfort and reduces dryness or scratching-related skin damage without treating the underlying biochemical disorder.

    Bland emollient

    Apply an unperfumed emollient to itchy skin as needed throughout the day, reducing or changing the product if irritation occurs.

    Keep emollient-contaminated clothing and bedding away from flames; worsening itch still requires the planned clinical and biochemical reassessment.