Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Sensitive menstrual, sexual and obstetric history

Obstetrics and gynaecology · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
History must not delay stabilisation

Collapse, major bleeding, severe pelvic pain, sepsis, eclampsia features, acute sexual assault danger or a positive pregnancy test with haemodynamic compromise requires immediate assessment while essential history is obtained in parallel.

Action: Use ABCDE, call the appropriate senior gynaecology, obstetric or emergency team, establish pregnancy possibility and bleeding severity quickly, and defer non-essential sensitive questions until privacy, safety and clinical stability permit.

Synopsis

Take a private, inclusive and clinically discriminating reproductive history that establishes immediate risk, respects the person’s language and autonomy, and guides proportionate examination, testing, safeguarding and follow-up.

  • Begin by explaining why particular questions matter, what will be recorded, and the limits of confidentiality; ask the patient how they prefer body parts, gender, partners and pregnancies to be described.
  • Offer part of the consultation alone as routine, use a professional interpreter rather than a partner, and check that later messages, letters and portal access are safe.
  • For bleeding, define last normal period, cycle interval and regularity, duration, flooding, clots, products changed, night leakage, pain, intermenstrual or postcoital bleeding and anaemia symptoms.
  • A sexual history is shaped by the clinical question: partners, practices, protection from infection, pregnancy prevention, previous infections, pain, bleeding, sexual function, consent and what the patient wants from care.
  • Record each pregnancy chronologically, including intendedness, gestation and outcome, ectopic or molar pregnancy, mode of birth, haemorrhage, hypertension, diabetes, prematurity, loss and the health of parent and child.
  • Ask about cervical screening, contraception, fertility goals, menopause symptoms, gynaecological procedures, medicines, anticoagulants and relevant family cancers without assuming anatomy or reproductive capacity.
  • Use neutral questions before direct safeguarding enquiry, then assess immediate danger, children or dependants, sexual violence and coercive control; do not promise absolute secrecy.
  • Summarise the timeline back to the patient, distinguish fact from uncertainty, agree examination and tests separately, and document declined elements without judgement or repeated pressure.

Key red flags

Syncope, shoulder-tip pain, unilateral pelvic pain or heavy bleeding with possible pregnancy raises ectopic pregnancy or haemorrhage and needs urgent location assessment.

Current threats, stalking, forced sex, contraception sabotage, restricted healthcare access or fear of a partner requires a private immediate-safety and safeguarding response.

Postmenopausal bleeding, persistent intermenstrual bleeding, a pelvic mass, unexplained weight loss or abnormal discharge requires cancer-pathway consideration rather than symptom treatment alone.

Fever, rigors, purulent discharge, severe tenderness, recent instrumentation or postpartum deterioration can indicate pelvic infection or sepsis and warrants urgent physiological assessment.

A child or young person describing exploitation, an adult at risk unable to protect themselves, or concern about forced marriage or FGM activates local safeguarding procedures.

Pregnancy-related danger

A missed or atypical period with unilateral pain, syncope, shoulder-tip pain or bleeding requires pregnancy testing and urgent ectopic assessment even when contraception was reportedly used.

Coercion signal

A partner answering, refusing privacy, monitoring communication, controlling medicines or sabotaging contraception can indicate coercive control and should prompt safe private enquiry.

Investigation priorities

01
Private, consented clinical interviewFirst step

Obtain an accurate history and enable disclosure without a companion shaping the account.

Management branches

Opening sequenceEstablish safety, privacy and the presenting timeline

Any consultation includes menstrual, sexual, obstetric or reproductive symptoms.

  1. Explain the purpose of sensitive questions, confirm communication preferences and confidentiality limits, and arrange professional interpretation where needed.
  2. Offer time alone, identify safe contact routes and establish physiology, bleeding severity, pain, pregnancy possibility and immediate safeguarding threats.
  3. Take a chronological symptom and reproductive history using neutral language, then summarise it back and correct misunderstandings before planning tests.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • GMC decision making and consentVoluntary decisions, information sharing, capacity and recording consent.
  • GMC intimate examinations and chaperonesConsent, dignity, chaperone offers and examination records.
  • NICE NG88 heavy menstrual bleeding recommendationsHistory, initial blood testing, investigation selection and patient priorities.
  • BASHH sexual history taking guidelineStructured, proportionate sexual history and risk assessment.
  • NICE NG12 suspected cancer recognition and referralBleeding patterns and other features requiring cancer-pathway assessment.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom