Synopsis
Support a voluntary, durable decision about vasectomy or female sterilisation by comparing permanent and reversible options, procedural failure, ectopic risk, recovery, clearance and future regret.
- Sterilisation is intended to be permanent. Discuss the realistic possibility that reversal will be unavailable, costly or unsuccessful and that IVF does not guarantee a live birth.
- Compare permanent methods with the implant and intrauterine contraception, which are at least as effective for many users, avoid permanent surgery and can be removed.
- Vasectomy is usually safer, simpler and more effective than laparoscopic female sterilisation, but it is not immediately effective and requires post-vasectomy semen clearance.
- Female sterilisation blocks or removes fallopian tubes, is over 99% effective but can fail; pregnancy after failure has an increased likelihood of being ectopic.
- Age, parity, disability and relationship status do not determine capacity or justify refusal. Explore higher observed regret in younger people without turning a risk factor into a prohibition.
- Discuss future scenarios neutrally: relationship change, bereavement, child illness, changing goals and an unexpected new partner. The patient, not a partner, gives consent.
- Continue effective contraception until female sterilisation is effective under the operative instructions, and after vasectomy until the laboratory confirms semen clearance.
- Sterilisation does not protect against STIs and does not directly change ovarian hormones or menopause; bleeding may change when a previous hormonal method is stopped.