DPDoctor's PassportEducation
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.
Full textbookMLAMSRAFoundation

Brain metastases

Recognise neurological metastatic disease and dangerous mass effect, define intracranial number, volume and anatomy with contrast MRI, establish or confirm the primary cancer and integrate surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy, systemic treatment, corticosteroid, seizure and supportive care.

!
Herniation, obstructive hydrocephalus or uncontrolled seizure

Reduced consciousness, new pupillary asymmetry, rapidly progressive deficit, repeated vomiting with severe mass effect, a posterior-fossa lesion obstructing CSF or status epilepticus requires immediate treatment before complete oncological staging.

Action: Use ABCDE care, protect oxygenation and cerebral perfusion, elevate the head, treat seizures and obtain urgent CT while contacting neurosurgery and acute oncology. Give dexamethasone promptly for clinically significant tumour-related vasogenic oedema and arrange emergency decompression, resection or CSF diversion when anatomy and prognosis support it.

Open the sections you need. The overview is shown first.
01OverviewDefinition, clinical context and the essential points that orientate the chapter.

Brain metastases arise when systemic tumour cells seed cerebral, cerebellar, brainstem or meningeal tissue. Symptoms reflect deposit location and surrounding oedema. A metastasis at the motor strip can cause weakness before headache, and posterior-fossa disease can obstruct cerebrospinal fluid rapidly. Many deposits lie at the grey–white junction and enhance sharply with disproportionate vasogenic oedema, but this pattern is not diagnostic by itself.

Acute CT is a stabilisation test. MRI with gadolinium and thin slices then establishes number, maximum diameter, total volume, eloquent-brain relationship, haemorrhage, leptomeningeal features and operative or radiosurgical targets. Review systemic cancer history, current treatment and original tissue. If the brain lesion is the first presentation, complete CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis and site-directed tests, but avoid an indiscriminate search that delays biopsy of the safest high-yield site.

Local treatment is chosen by a combined neuro-oncology and site-specific cancer MDT. Surgery offers immediate decompression and tissue for a large accessible dominant lesion. Stereotactic radiation treats focused targets while sparing much uninvolved brain and is increasingly selected by total volume and anatomy, not a rigid count. Whole-brain radiation may reduce new intracranial events in extensive disease but has cognitive cost and limited value when prognosis is short; supportive care can be the more honest active choice.

Systemic biology now changes intracranial sequencing. Osimertinib for EGFR-mutant lung cancer, an ALK inhibitor with CNS activity, HER2-directed regimens and melanoma immunotherapy or BRAF–MEK treatment may control small asymptomatic deposits. A large symptomatic lesion still needs local decompression or radiation. Follow-up MRI must distinguish recurrence from radionecrosis and immune inflammation, using serial change, perfusion, spectroscopy, PET or tissue when the answer changes treatment.

Key points

  • Brain metastases are more common than malignant primary brain tumours and most often arise from lung, breast, melanoma, renal and colorectal cancers.
  • Presentation includes headache, focal deficit, seizure, cognitive or personality change, ataxia and occasionally haemorrhage or an incidental staging-scan finding.
  • Emergency non-contrast CT is first line for acute deterioration because it rapidly identifies haemorrhage, hydrocephalus and dangerous mass effect.
  • Contrast-enhanced MRI is the preferred definitive intracranial staging test; it detects small posterior-fossa, cortical and leptomeningeal lesions better and guides surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy.
  • Restage extracranial disease and review the primary histology and molecular profile because systemic options and expected survival shape intracranial treatment.
  • A solitary or atypical lesion, unknown primary, long cancer-free interval or discordant systemic picture often needs surgical or stereotactic biopsy before irreversible treatment.
  • First-line symptomatic treatment for clinically important vasogenic oedema is dexamethasone at the lowest effective dose, with a planned taper after surgery, radiation or systemic response.
  • Do not give routine corticosteroid to every asymptomatic small metastasis, because hyperglycaemia, infection, myopathy, delirium and reduced immunotherapy efficacy can outweigh benefit.
  • Treat a tumour-related seizure with a low-interaction antiseizure medicine; do not prescribe prophylactic antiseizure medication indefinitely to a patient who has never seized.
  • Surgical resection is preferred for selected large, accessible, symptomatic solitary or dominant lesions, particularly when tissue, decompression and rapid neurological improvement are needed.
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy provides high local control for limited lesions or selected total intracranial volume and for many postoperative cavities.
  • Whole-brain radiotherapy is reserved for selected extensive disease or situations unsuitable for focal treatment; discuss expected intracranial benefit against fatigue, alopecia and cognitive harm.
  • CNS-active systemic treatment may be central in targetable lung cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer and melanoma, but symptomatic local mass effect usually needs prompt local therapy rather than waiting for systemic response.
  • Management is based on performance, neurological function, lesion number and volume, extracranial control, molecular options, prognosis and patient goals—not lesion count alone.
02AetiologyUnderlying causes, associations and risk factors, with why each one matters.
01

Common epithelial primaries

Lung and breast cancer account for many brain metastases because of prevalence and biological tropism, followed by melanoma, renal, colorectal and other solid tumours.

02

Molecularly selected tropism

HER2-positive breast cancer and EGFR- or ALK-driven lung cancer have distinctive CNS risks and systemic options, while melanoma has a strong tendency for multifocal spread.

03

Unknown primary presentation

A brain lesion can be the first cancer manifestation, requiring systemic imaging and often tissue because an assumed metastasis could be primary glioma, lymphoma or infection.

04

Later sanctuary relapse

Improved extracranial control and variable blood–brain drug penetration allow CNS progression months or years after an otherwise effective systemic treatment.

03PathophysiologyThe causal sequence from the underlying abnormality to symptoms and harm.
  1. 1
    Blood-borne seeding

    Circulating tumour cells lodge in small vessels, often at the grey–white junction or watershed regions, cross the neurovascular unit and establish one or multiple deposits.

  2. 2
    Vasogenic oedema amplifies symptoms

    Tumour-disrupted capillaries leak fluid into white matter, creating deficits and pressure far beyond the enhancing deposit; corticosteroids reduce this oedema rather than killing tumour.

  3. 3
    Location outweighs diameter

    A small motor-cortex, brainstem or posterior-fossa lesion can cause major disability, while a larger frontal deposit may initially produce only subtle cognitive change.

  4. 4
    Haemorrhage and seizure complicate deposits

    Fragile tumour vessels can bleed and cortical irritation can generate focal or bilateral tonic–clonic seizures, sometimes revealing a previously occult metastasis.

  5. 5
    Leptomeningeal spread follows CSF

    Tumour coating meninges and nerve roots produces multifocal cranial, spinal and radicular symptoms and requires a different whole-neuraxis and systemic management strategy.

04Clinical features and red flagsSymptoms, examination findings, patterns of presentation and time-critical warnings.
Focal cerebral syndrome

Unilateral weakness, aphasia, neglect, field loss or altered sensation localises a deposit and can evolve over hours with haemorrhage or days with oedema.

Seizure presentation

Focal motor, sensory or experiential onset with or without bilateral convulsion suggests cortical irritation and requires imaging and antiseizure safety planning.

Raised intracranial pressure

Progressive headache, morning vomiting, papilloedema, sixth-nerve palsy and drowsiness reflect oedema, mass effect or obstructed cerebrospinal fluid.

Posterior-fossa syndromeRed flag

Gait ataxia, vertigo, dysarthria, nystagmus, vomiting and cranial-nerve signs can precede acute hydrocephalus and require urgent neurosurgical review.

Intratumoural bleedRed flag

Sudden severe headache, focal deficit or reduced consciousness, particularly with melanoma or renal cancer, demands emergency CT for haemorrhage.

Leptomeningeal pattern

Multiple cranial neuropathies, radicular pain, cauda-equina symptoms, hearing loss or communicating hydrocephalus suggests diffuse CSF-surface spread.

Red flags requiring action

  • A first seizure, focal weakness, aphasia, visual loss, ataxia or personality change in a patient with current or previous cancer requires urgent brain imaging.
  • Progressive headache with vomiting, papilloedema, drowsiness or sixth-nerve palsy suggests raised intracranial pressure rather than an ordinary treatment side effect.
  • Falling consciousness, unequal pupils, abnormal posturing or Cushing physiology indicates impending herniation and needs immediate neurosurgical escalation.
  • A cerebellar or posterior-fossa metastasis can obstruct cerebrospinal fluid abruptly and may need urgent resection or diversion even when extracranial disease is present.
  • Melanoma, renal, thyroid and choriocarcinoma metastases can bleed; a sudden severe headache or deficit requires emergency non-contrast CT.
  • Cranial neuropathies, radicular pain, multifocal neurological signs or headache with a near-normal scan raises leptomeningeal disease and requires dedicated MRI and selected CSF assessment.
  • Do not attribute neurological change to opioids, infection or metabolic disturbance until intracranial progression, haemorrhage and seizure have been considered in parallel.
05InvestigationsWhat to request, why it matters and how to interpret it.
Investigation order

Read from the initial assessment onwards. Tests may run in parallel in urgent care; first-line, preferred, confirmatory, definitive and gold-standard labels appear only when the chapter explicitly states them.

  1. 01
    Emergency non-contrast CT brainFirst step
    Why
    Identify acute haemorrhage, major oedema, hydrocephalus and shift rapidly when consciousness, seizure or focal function deteriorates.
    Interpretation and limitations
    A normal or single-lesion CT underestimates small metastases; proceed to contrast MRI once the patient is stable and do not delay neurosurgery for a complete systemic work-up.
  2. 02
    Preferred contrast MRI brainPreferred
    Why
    Define lesion number, total volume, posterior-fossa and meningeal involvement, surgical anatomy and stereotactic targets.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Include diffusion and susceptibility sequences and thin post-contrast imaging; compare with previous radiation fields because enhancement alone cannot separate recurrence and treatment effect.
  3. 03
    Systemic restaging and molecular review
    Why
    Assess extracranial cancer burden, primary site, available CNS-active targets and overall treatment opportunity using CT and site-specific studies.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Review original histology and contemporary molecular results; a new accessible extracranial lesion may provide safer tissue, but do not assume it explains an atypical brain mass.
  4. 04
    Reference tissue when diagnosis is uncertain
    Why
    Distinguish metastasis from glioma, lymphoma, infection or inflammation and obtain current histology and biomarkers.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Favour resection for a large accessible symptomatic lesion and stereotactic core for a deep target; preserve material for immunohistochemistry and molecular comparison with the primary.
  5. 05
    Assessment for leptomeningeal disease
    Why
    Use contrast MRI of brain and relevant spine and selected CSF cytology when multifocal cranial or radicular symptoms suggest CSF spread.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Image first to exclude unsafe pressure or obstruction; one negative CSF sample does not exclude disease, and repeated optimally processed volume may increase yield.
  6. 06
    Treatment-effect assessment
    Why
    Evaluate enlarging enhancement after stereotactic or immune treatment with serial MRI, perfusion, spectroscopy, amino-acid PET or tissue.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Radionecrosis can occur months later and immune inflammation can transiently worsen imaging; match scans to symptoms, steroid need, radiation dose map and temporal evolution.
06Differential diagnosisRealistic alternatives and the features that help distinguish them.
01

Primary diffuse glioma

A solitary infiltrative lesion with extensive non-enhancing T2 change may be glioma, but imaging overlaps and tissue is required when the distinction alters treatment.

02

Abscess or opportunistic infection

Fever, immune suppression, diffusion restriction and an infectious source support abscess, toxoplasmosis or fungal disease; empirical steroid alone can worsen or obscure infection.

03

Treatment effect

Radiation necrosis, pseudoprogression and immune-treatment inflammation can enlarge or enhance after therapy and may require serial MRI, perfusion imaging, PET or biopsy.

04

Vascular lesion

Infarction, primary haemorrhage and cavernoma can present suddenly; diffusion and susceptibility sequences plus temporal evolution distinguish them from tumour.

05

Primary CNS lymphoma or demyelination

Deep diffusion-restricting lymphoma and tumefactive demyelination can mimic metastasis, particularly when no extracranial primary is established or the pattern is atypical.

07ManagementImmediate care, first-line treatment, alternatives and escalation.
01Acute neurological declineControl oedema and mass effect firstFirst stepA patient with known or possible cancer develops reduced consciousness, progressive deficit, severe vomiting or seizure.
  1. 1Use ABCDE care, check glucose and reversible metabolic causes, treat seizure, elevate the head and obtain emergency non-contrast CT while contacting acute oncology and neurosurgery.
  2. 2Give dexamethasone for significant tumour-related oedema and use urgent resection or CSF diversion for a suitable large lesion, haemorrhage, posterior-fossa obstruction or hydrocephalus.
  3. 3DefinitiveAfter stabilisation, obtain contrast MRI, systemic staging and tissue where needed and replace an indefinite steroid course with a definitive local and systemic plan.
02New intracranial lesionsConfirm burden, biology and prognosisMRI shows one or more lesions compatible with brain metastases.
  1. 1Record neurological function, seizure and steroid need and quantify number, volume, location, haemorrhage and leptomeningeal features rather than describing lesions only as multiple.
  2. 2Restage extracranial disease and review primary pathology, driver biomarkers, previous systemic and radiation treatment and realistic life expectancy.
  3. 3Obtain tissue for unknown, solitary, atypical or discordant disease and discuss surgery, stereotactic radiation, CNS-active systemic treatment, whole-brain radiation and supportive care in the combined MDT.
03Limited or dominant diseaseChoose surgery or focused radiation by anatomyA small number or limited total volume of deposits is technically amenable to local control.
  1. 1Use surgery for a large accessible symptomatic lesion needing decompression or tissue and plan the postoperative cavity for stereotactic treatment where indicated.
  2. 2Use single-fraction radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for suitable intact lesions according to size, location and normal-tissue tolerance.
  3. 3Coordinate rather than interrupt effective systemic treatment unnecessarily, taper steroid and obtain early follow-up MRI to establish response and detect new disease.
04Extensive or progressing diseaseMatch treatment burden to achievable benefitIntracranial disease is numerous, diffuse, leptomeningeal, repeatedly recurring or occurs with uncontrolled systemic cancer.
  1. 1Identify any immediately threatening dominant lesion and any targetable systemic biology before assuming whole-brain treatment is the only option.
  2. 2Consider whole-brain radiotherapy with cognitive-sparing measures where appropriate, or CNS-active systemic therapy, but use best supportive care when burdens exceed likely neurological benefit.
  3. 3Review cognition, steroid toxicity, seizures, mobility, swallowing, communication and caregiver capacity frequently and revise goals before crisis removes patient choice.
Key medicines and prescribing safety3 treatments · regimens, roles and cautions
Reduces tumour-associated vasogenic oedema and rapidly improves headache, vomiting and focal deficits while surgery, radiation or systemic therapy takes effect.

Dexamethasone for symptomatic oedema

Use the lowest effective oral or intravenous dose, commonly 4 to 8 mg daily for moderate symptoms and up to 16 mg daily in divided doses for severe mass effect, then taper promptly after definitive control.

Avoid routine use in asymptomatic disease; monitor glucose, infection, proximal weakness, delirium, mood, gastrointestinal risk and adrenal suppression and consider interaction with immunotherapy efficacy.

Controls tumour-related seizures with fewer cytochrome interactions than older enzyme-inducing antiseizure medicines.

Levetiracetam after a metastatic seizure

Start commonly at 500 mg orally twice daily and titrate according to recurrent seizures, tolerability and renal function, with intravenous equivalent during acute inability to swallow.

Routine prophylaxis in a patient who has never seized is not recommended; monitor sedation, dizziness, irritability and depression and provide driving and water-safety advice.

May reduce cognitive decline alongside whole-brain radiotherapy, particularly when combined with hippocampal avoidance in patients with adequate prognosis and anatomy.

Memantine with selected whole-brain radiotherapy

When used in an eligible cognitive-sparing protocol, titrate oral memantine from 5 mg daily to 10 mg twice daily over four weeks and continue for up to 24 weeks if tolerated.

Adjust for renal impairment and monitor dizziness, headache, constipation and confusion; it does not make whole-brain treatment beneficial when prognosis and disease pattern do not justify radiation.

08ComplicationsImportant consequences, why they occur and why they matter clinically.
01

Raised pressure and herniation

Combined tumour volume, oedema, haemorrhage and hydrocephalus can reduce consciousness and compress brainstem, requiring corticosteroid and rapid anatomical control.

02

Seizure and neurological disability

Cortical disease causes recurrent seizures, weakness, aphasia, visual loss, ataxia and cognitive change that affect driving, falls, work and independent medication use.

03

Intratumoural haemorrhage

Bleeding may produce sudden deficit and complicate anticoagulation decisions, although tumour-associated thrombosis risk remains high and requires individual balancing.

04

Leptomeningeal progression

CSF dissemination can cause multiple cranial neuropathies, radiculopathy, hydrocephalus, cauda-equina symptoms and rapid decline despite control of parenchymal lesions.

05

Treatment-related cognitive and systemic harm

Whole-brain radiation, surgery, corticosteroids, antiseizure drugs and systemic therapy can cause cognitive decline, wound problems, infection, myopathy, mood change and organ toxicity.

09Monitoring and follow-upTreatment response, safety checks and longer-term review.
  • Review neurological examination, cognition, headache, vomiting, gait, swallowing and seizure frequency at each contact and give a direct route for same-day deterioration.
  • Reconcile dexamethasone dose at every visit and record a taper, monitoring glucose, infection, sleep, mood, proximal strength and adrenal-risk education.
  • Use MRI after local or systemic treatment at an interval matched to biology and symptoms, then regularly enough to detect treatable recurrence without replacing clinical assessment.
  • After stereotactic radiation, review radiation dose maps and serial imaging before labelling enlarging enhancement recurrence; seek advanced imaging or tissue for meaningful uncertainty.
  • Monitor extracranial disease and systemic drug toxicity in parallel because intracranial control alone may not improve function or survival when systemic cancer progresses.
  • Track antiseizure adherence, adverse effects, rescue plan, legal driving restrictions, falls and caregiver understanding after any seizure.
  • Assess rehabilitation, communication aids, work, capacity, advance-care preferences and family burden early, with specialist palliative care available during active oncology treatment.
10Special situationsVariants, exceptions and circumstances that change the usual approach.

Count is not the whole burden

Total volume, location, symptoms and expected new-lesion risk often guide stereotactic suitability better than an arbitrary lesion-number cut-off.

Steroid response is not diagnostic

Oedema around metastasis, glioma and lymphoma may all improve, while infection can worsen; response never replaces MRI and tissue reasoning.

A solitary lesion deserves doubt

Even with previous cancer, a single late brain mass may be a new primary tumour, infection or unrelated pathology whose treatment is fundamentally different.

The dominant lesion drives urgency

One large posterior-fossa or motor-region deposit may require surgery even when several smaller lesions will receive radiosurgery or systemic treatment.

Radionecrosis can mimic failure

Delayed inflammatory necrosis after stereotactic radiation can enlarge, enhance and cause oedema, making treatment history and tissue sometimes decisive.

Systemic drugs can be intracranial drugs

Modern targeted and immune regimens can control selected asymptomatic deposits, but molecular eligibility and the need for immediate decompression still govern sequencing.

11Common pitfallsFrequent interpretation and management errors.
  1. 01

    Calling new confusion medication related without examining for focal signs or imaging the brain.

  2. 02

    Using a normal acute CT to exclude small, posterior-fossa or leptomeningeal metastases.

  3. 03

    Assuming a solitary lesion is metastatic solely because the patient previously had cancer.

  4. 04

    Giving high-dose dexamethasone indefinitely without a definitive treatment and taper plan.

  5. 05

    Starting prophylactic antiseizure medication in every seizure-naive patient.

  6. 06

    Choosing treatment by lesion count while ignoring volume, location, systemic control and function.

  7. 07

    Waiting for systemic therapy to shrink a large lesion causing dangerous mass effect.

  8. 08

    Giving whole-brain radiotherapy automatically when focused treatment or supportive care is more appropriate.

  9. 09

    Calling all post-stereotactic enhancement progression without considering radionecrosis.

  10. 10

    Separating intracranial decisions from primary-cancer biology, rehabilitation and palliative priorities.

Practice

Two practice questions

Question 1 of 20 correct
Oncology and palliative careOriginal SBA

Symptomatic oedema around a new metastasis

A patient with metastatic lung cancer develops worsening headache, vomiting and right-arm weakness. CT shows a left frontal mass with extensive vasogenic oedema and midline shift. What is the most appropriate immediate approach?

Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom