Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Hereditary cancer syndromes and genetic referral

Oncology and palliative care · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull

Synopsis

Recognise patterns of inherited cancer predisposition, take and verify a three-generation pedigree, refer through genomic services, and manage testing, surveillance and family communication without acting on uncertain variants.

  • Most cancers are not caused by a single inherited high-penetrance variant, but age, tumour pattern and family history can identify people who need genomic assessment.
  • Referral clues include unusually young cancer, multiple primaries, bilateral disease, characteristic rare tumours and several related cancers on one side of a family.
  • Take a three-generation pedigree with cancer site, age at diagnosis, ancestry where relevant and results of any previous testing; verify pathology when major decisions depend on it.
  • Test an affected relative first when possible because a negative result in an unaffected person may be uninformative.
  • A pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant can guide surveillance, risk-reducing options, targeted treatment and predictive testing of adult relatives.
  • A variant of uncertain significance is not a diagnosis and must not drive prophylactic surgery or predictive family testing.
  • Consent covers possible results, limitations, family implications, data use, reproductive choices and the possibility of unexpected information.
  • People without an identified variant may still warrant enhanced surveillance when their verified family history remains strongly suggestive.

Investigation priorities

01
Three-generation pedigreeFirst step

Estimate whether personal and family pattern meets genomic referral criteria.

Management branches

RecogniseBuild and verify inherited-risk evidence

Personal or family cancer features suggest more than sporadic risk.

  1. Take a three-generation pedigree and obtain the existing pathology or family genetic report rather than relying on a remembered gene name.
  2. Check the current National Genomic Test Directory or specialist criteria and refer with the features that meet them.
  3. Address immediate cancer treatment separately; urgent therapeutic biomarker testing may run in parallel with fuller genetics assessment.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status6 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • Genomics Education: family history of cancerPedigree assessment, red flags and referral considerations for possible inherited cancer predisposition.
  • NHS England National Genomic Test DirectoriesCurrent national eligibility and test scope for validated constitutional cancer investigations.
  • Royal College of Pathologists cancer datasetsTumour biomarkers and pathological features that can trigger inherited-risk assessment.
  • NICE shared decision making recommendationsConsent, uncertainty and preference-sensitive preventive decisions.
  • Genomics Education: variant of uncertain significanceWhy a VUS is not actionable and must not direct predictive testing or irreversible prevention.
  • Genomics Education: predictive testingTesting unaffected relatives for a known familial pathogenic variant through a consented genetics pathway.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem ·

Content changes
Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom