Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

← Paediatrics and child health indexChapter sections
OverviewAetiologyPathophysiologyClinical features and red flagsInvestigationsDifferential diagnosisManagementComplicationsMonitoring and follow-upSpecial situationsCommon pitfallsQuestionsSources
Full textbook13 sectionsOpen only what you need
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.

IgE-mediated food allergy

Paediatrics and child health · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Food-triggered anaphylaxis

Airway swelling, wheeze, hypoxia, hypotension, collapse or rapidly progressive multisystem symptoms after food exposure is anaphylaxis even when skin signs are absent.

Action: Use ABCDE, lay the child appropriately, give intramuscular adrenaline immediately into the anterolateral thigh, call emergency services and repeat adrenaline after five minutes if airway, breathing or circulation compromise persists.

Overview

Diagnose immediate food allergy from a reproducible clinical history, use targeted sensitisation testing correctly, distinguish allergy from tolerance and build safe avoidance, nutrition, emergency and school plans.

Take an allergy-focused history before testing. Record the exact ingredient and brand, raw or cooked form, amount, time to first symptom, skin, airway, breathing, circulation and gastrointestinal features, duration, treatment and reproducibility. Ask whether the food was previously tolerated and what has been eaten safely since. Review eczema, asthma, rhinitis, family atopy and exercise, infection or medicine cofactors.

Immediate hives or swelling alone suggests IgE-mediated allergy but does not predict the next reaction's severity. Anaphylaxis is defined by dangerous airway, breathing or circulation compromise, usually with rapid onset; skin signs can be absent. Isolated perioral redness from irritant contact and vomiting from texture aversion require different reasoning.

Skin-prick and serum specific-IgE tests measure sensitisation. Select the suspected food rather than a panel and use trained services with valid extracts and controls. Component-resolved testing can distinguish stable storage proteins from pollen-related cross-reactivity in selected peanut or tree-nut questions, but no result replaces clinical context.

Aetiology

01

Food protein sensitisation

Immune sensitisation to stable or labile food proteins permits allergen-specific IgE to bind mast cells and basophils before clinical exposure.

02

Common childhood allergens

Cow's milk, hen's egg, peanut, tree nuts, wheat, sesame, fish and shellfish account for most clinically important childhood reactions.

03

Atopic barrier dysfunction

Moderate or severe eczema, especially in infancy, permits cutaneous allergen exposure and is associated with later IgE-mediated food allergy.

04

Cofactor-dependent allergy

Exercise, infection, NSAIDs, alcohol in older adolescents or menstruation can lower reaction threshold and explain inconsistent episodes.

Pathophysiology

  1. 1
    IgE cross-linking

    Allergen binds adjacent mast-cell-bound IgE molecules, triggering rapid release of histamine, tryptase, leukotrienes and other mediators.

  2. 2
    Multiorgan mediator effects

    Vasodilation, capillary leak, bronchoconstriction, mucosal oedema, itch and gastrointestinal smooth-muscle activation create the acute reaction phenotype.

  3. 3
    Threshold and matrix effects

    Dose, food processing, digestion and cofactor exposure change how much allergen reaches immune targets and whether symptoms occur.

  4. 4
    Natural tolerance development

    Milk and egg allergy commonly resolves with age, particularly to baked forms, while peanut and tree-nut allergy more often persists.

Clinical features and red flags

Immediate cutaneous reaction

Migratory urticaria, flushing and lip or eyelid angioedema within minutes of eating supports mast-cell mediator release.

Respiratory food reaction

Hoarse voice, stridor, persistent cough, wheeze or hypoxia after exposure indicates anaphylaxis requiring immediate adrenaline.

Gastrointestinal immediate reaction

Rapid repetitive vomiting or severe abdominal pain can accompany IgE allergy, especially when combined with skin or respiratory signs.

Pollen food syndrome

Immediate mouth and throat itch to raw plant foods with tolerance when cooked suggests labile pollen-cross-reactive proteins.

Sensitisation without allergy

A positive test in a child who eats a normal portion without symptoms demonstrates tolerance and should not trigger exclusion.

Red flags requiring action

  • Airway, breathing or circulation compromise after food exposure requires adrenaline immediately; antihistamine must not delay first-line treatment.
  • A previous severe reaction, poorly controlled asthma, trace-trigger reaction or difficulty avoiding the allergen increases future risk and urgency of specialist review.
  • Infants with faltering growth, multiple exclusions, feeding aversion or restricted diet need early paediatric dietetic assessment to prevent nutritional harm.

Investigations

  1. 01
    First-line allergy-focused historyFirst stepFirst line
    Why
    Estimate clinical probability and select the exact food, form and mechanism for testing.
    Interpretation and limitations
    A reproducible immediate phenotype raises pretest probability; ongoing full tolerance makes current clinical allergy unlikely.
  2. 02
    Targeted skin-prick testing
    Why
    Detect allergen-specific cutaneous mast-cell sensitisation using valid controls and trained interpretation.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Wheal size changes probability but never determines reaction severity or proves allergy without a compatible history.
  3. 03
    Targeted serum specific IgE
    Why
    Assess sensitisation when skin testing is unavailable, unsafe or affected by antihistamine or skin disease.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Interpret concentration with age, food and clinical phenotype; low or undetectable results may not exclude every convincing reaction.
  4. 04
    Component-resolved diagnostics
    Why
    Refine selected nut or pollen-related risk questions by identifying IgE to individual proteins.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Stable storage-protein sensitisation often supports systemic risk, while labile pollen proteins support oral symptoms; specialist context remains essential.
  5. 05

Differential diagnosis

01

Non-IgE gastrointestinal allergy

Delayed vomiting, diarrhoea, blood or faltering growth hours to days later lacks immediate mast-cell skin and respiratory features.

02

Food intolerance

Lactose malabsorption, pharmacological food effects and fermentable carbohydrate symptoms are dose-related and do not involve allergen-specific IgE.

03

Acute viral illness

Urticaria and vomiting during infection can coincide with eating and create a false food association without reproducible exposure timing.

04

Chronic spontaneous urticaria

Near-daily migratory wheals for more than six weeks are usually spontaneous or autoimmune rather than caused by repeatedly eaten foods.

05

Eosinophilic oesophagitis

Chronic dysphagia, food sticking, reflux-like symptoms or feeding aversion reflects oesophageal eosinophilic inflammation requiring endoscopy and biopsy.

Management

01Acute reactionTreat physiology firstFirst stepFood exposure causes airway, breathing or circulation compromise.+
  1. 1Give intramuscular adrenaline immediately and call emergency services under the anaphylaxis algorithm.
  2. 2Position safely, support airway, oxygenation and circulation and repeat adrenaline at five minutes if needed.
  3. 3Document food, dose, timing, cofactors and treatment for specialist follow-up.
02DiagnoseTest the history not a panelA reproducible immediate food-associated reaction is reported.+
  1. 1Take a structured allergy history and identify tolerated foods and cofactors.
  2. 2Request targeted skin-prick or specific-IgE testing through an appropriately trained pathway.
  3. 3Use supervised oral challenge when residual uncertainty changes avoidance or emergency decisions.

Complications

01

Anaphylaxis

Rapid mediator release can obstruct the airway, impair ventilation and collapse circulation, sometimes without urticaria or angioedema.

02

Nutritional deficiency

Unsupervised exclusion of milk, egg, wheat or multiple foods can impair energy, protein, calcium, vitamin and growth requirements.

03

Accidental exposure

Hidden ingredients, cross-contact, unclear labels and inconsistent school procedures create avoidable reactions outside the home and during travel.

04

Anxiety and restricted participation

Fear of exposure can impair eating, school, travel and social development even when objective reaction risk is lower.

Monitoring and follow-up

  • Plot weight and height and review dietary adequacy after any staple-food or multiple-food exclusion.
  • Record every accidental exposure with food form, dose, timing, cofactors, symptoms and treatment.
  • Check asthma symptoms, inhaler access and control because respiratory comorbidity modifies reaction risk.
  • Review auto-injector number, expiry, storage, technique and school access when devices are prescribed.
  • Reassess developing tolerance with targeted testing or challenge only when the result will change management.
  • Address eating anxiety, bullying, school participation and adolescent risk-taking directly during follow-up.

Special situations

Tolerance outranks a test

A child who regularly eats a normal portion without symptoms is not clinically allergic merely because sensitisation is detected.

Cooking changes proteins

Heat destroys some labile allergens but not stable storage proteins, explaining tolerance of baked milk or pollen-related cooked fruit.

Severity is not in wheal size

Skin-test diameter estimates probability of reaction, not how dangerous the next accidental exposure will be.

Panels manufacture restriction

Testing foods without a history identifies sensitisation and often converts a diverse safe diet into unnecessary avoidance.

School planning is treatment

Clear responsibilities, accessible medicine and rehearsal reduce delay more effectively than a form filed away unread.

Common pitfalls

  1. 01

    Diagnosing allergy from a positive test alone.

  2. 02

    Ordering broad food panels without a clinical hypothesis.

  3. 03

    Using IgG or alternative commercial intolerance tests.

  4. 04

    Removing multiple staple foods without dietetic replacement.

  5. 05

    Letting antihistamine delay adrenaline in anaphylaxis.

  6. 06

    Advising home challenge after a convincing immediate reaction.

  7. 07

    Forgetting asthma and school emergency planning.

Practice

Two practice questions

Your practice draft is saved in this browser.

Question 1 of 2
0 correct
Paediatrics and child healthOriginal SBA

Positive test with tolerance

A child eats a full serving of peanut weekly without symptoms but has a low positive peanut-specific IgE found on a broad panel. What is the best interpretation?

Choose one answer, then submit
← Rapid synopsisBack to overviewAll Paediatrics and child health topics →
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • NICE CG116 Food AllergyAllergy-focused history, targeted testing, elimination and referral under age 19.
  • NICE QS118 Food AllergyDiagnostic quality, dietetic support and specialist referral priorities.
  • NHS Food Allergy OverviewImmediate symptoms, diagnosis, avoidance and emergency care.
  • BSACI 2026 Hospital Food Challenge StatementCurrent UK specialist standards for selecting, conducting and interpreting hospital food challenges.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom
When probability remains uncertain and the answer will change diet or emergency planning, the allergy team performs an incremental oral challenge with observation and resuscitation capability. Challenge may confirm allergy, establish tolerance or define a safe threshold. Home trials are inappropriate after a convincing immediate reaction unless a specialist explicitly selects a low-risk protocol.

Management removes the allergen while protecting nutrition and ordinary childhood. Teach label reading, precautionary-allergen interpretation, cross-contact prevention, restaurant communication and age-appropriate self-advocacy. Supply school with a current written plan, named devices, expiry checks and trained staff. Children should not be isolated from activities solely because food allergy exists.

Follow-up reviews accidental reactions, asthma, growth, dietary diversity and changing test or challenge probability. Do not test repeatedly without a clinical question. For milk or egg, falling sensitisation and tolerated baked forms may support supervised progression. Persistent peanut, nut, fish or shellfish allergy requires transition planning and adolescent risk counselling.

Key points

  • IgE-mediated reactions usually begin within minutes and generally within two hours of eating, with urticaria, angioedema, vomiting, wheeze or cardiovascular symptoms.
  • Diagnosis starts with the exact food, form, dose, timing, reproducibility, cofactors and treatment response, alongside tolerance of related or previously eaten foods.
  • Perform skin-prick testing or serum specific IgE only to foods suggested by the history and interpret results by age, test size or concentration and pretest probability.
  • A positive sensitisation test does not prove clinical allergy and a broad panel often creates false labels and unnecessary exclusions.
  • A medically supervised oral food challenge is the reference clinical test when history and sensitisation leave meaningful uncertainty; it must occur where anaphylaxis can be treated.
  • Do not use serum food-specific IgG, hair analysis, kinesiology, Vega testing or unvalidated home tests to diagnose food allergy.
  • Avoid only the confirmed allergen, involve a paediatric dietitian for staple or multiple foods and preserve nutritionally useful tolerated forms unless the specialist plan says otherwise.
  • Risk assessment determines whether to prescribe adrenaline auto-injectors; train the child, family and school with the exact device and provide a written emergency plan.
  • A reaction to a tiny amount, a reaction during exercise or cofactor exposure, or an apparently inconsistent trigger requires specialist challenge and cofactor assessment.
  • Isolated positive IgE or skin testing without a compatible reaction history demonstrates sensitisation, not necessarily clinical allergy.
  • Persistent dysphagia, food impaction or feeding difficulty raises eosinophilic oesophagitis rather than ordinary immediate food allergy and needs gastroenterology assessment.
  • Supervised oral food challenge
    Why
    Establish clinical reactivity or tolerance when uncertainty materially affects diet and emergency planning.
    Interpretation and limitations
    This is the reference clinical investigation, performed with incremental dosing, observation and immediate anaphylaxis treatment available.
    03Protect nutritionAvoid precisely and replace wellClinical assessment supports exclusion of a food or food group.+
    1. 1Exclude only the confirmed trigger and preserve tolerated related foods where safe.
    2. 2Refer staple or multiple-food exclusions to a paediatric allergy dietitian.
    3. 3Plot growth and review calcium, vitamin D, protein, energy and feeding behaviour.
    04Prevent harmBuild emergency and school plansThe child's reaction and exposure profile creates future accidental-risk concern.+
    1. 1Decide auto-injector need and prescribe the correct device through specialist risk assessment.
    2. 2Train child, caregivers and school using the actual device and a written action plan.
    3. 3Review asthma control, expiry, accidental reactions and tolerance reassessment at planned intervals.
    Asthma control matters because poorly controlled asthma increases the danger of respiratory food reactions and complicates recognition.
  • Review allergy over time because milk and egg tolerance can develop; home reintroduction or baked-food ladders are used only for selected children under a documented specialist plan.