Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Incidental findings, consent and confidentiality

Paediatrics and child health · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull

Synopsis

Prepare families for unexpected genomic information, obtain valid child-centred consent, distinguish report categories, protect confidentiality while addressing serious familial risk, and document proportionate interpretation, disclosure and follow-up.

  • Clarify the laboratory's actual analysis and reporting policy before consent; broad genomic data do not mean that every possible disease association will be searched for or returned.
  • Distinguish a secondary or additional finding sought under policy from an incidental or unsolicited finding discovered while answering the primary clinical question.
  • Explain likely outcomes in accessible terms: diagnostic, uncertain, negative, carrier, familial and occasionally unexpected information about health or biological relationships.
  • Assess capacity or competence for the specific decision, involve every child according to understanding and give a competent young person control over their own genomic testing.
  • Parents usually decide for a child lacking competence, but the test should serve the child's interests; adult-onset predictive information without childhood benefit often warrants deferral.
  • A variant of uncertain significance is not a confirmed incidental diagnosis and should not be disclosed as actionable simply because the gene is serious.
  • Confidentiality is the starting point when a result matters to relatives; seek patient-led sharing and disclose without consent only exceptionally to prevent serious harm after senior review.
  • Record what was discussed, preferences, authority, material limitations, the exact reported finding, consultation with genetics and the agreed plan for the child and relatives.

Investigation priorities

01
Pre-test scope reviewFirst step

Confirm which genes, variant classes and additional findings the laboratory may analyse and report.

Management branches

ConsentDefine scope before sampling

Broad genomic analysis is proposed for a child or young person.

  1. Confirm the test indication, analytical scope, reporting policy, data handling and possible result categories.
  2. Assess decision-making authority and involve the child with developmentally appropriate explanation and support.
  3. Document material preferences, family concerns and who should receive and explain the eventual report.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • GMC Confidentiality guidanceCore confidentiality duties, family information and serious-harm disclosure principles.
  • GMC Decision making and consentSupported decisions, material information, capacity and valid consent standards.
  • GMC zero to eighteen years guidanceChild competence, parental responsibility, confidentiality and best-interest decision principles.
  • NHS Genomics Education knowledge hubClinical genomic consent, variant classification, secondary findings and familial implications.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom