Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidPSA

Using clinical data to adjust prescribing

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Use clinical observations, laboratory trends and treatment response to adjust prescribing, distinguishing a meaningful change in the patient from an isolated number or an inappropriate target.

  • Identify the decision the data should inform, then check identity, units, timing, reliability and the relevant baseline before changing treatment.
  • Combine the result with symptoms, examination, actual medicine use and the indication. A number within a population range can still be unsafe for the individual, and an abnormal value can sometimes be an expected monitored response.
  • Distinguish stable impairment from acute deterioration. A chronic dose table cannot safely substitute for assessment of dehydration, sepsis, hypoxia or rapidly evolving organ injury.

Reasoning priorities

01
Validated laboratory values and clinical trajectory

Establish whether the result supports a stable dose category or acute assessment.

Check patient identity, units, sample date and previous measurements. A laboratory eGFR during rapidly changing creatinine is not a dependable steady-state clearance. Assess intake, urine output and physiological stability before applying a chronic medicine dose limit to an acutely unwell person.

Worked reasoning

Worked exampleAdjust metformin to a stable renal dose ceiling

A 72-year-old takes metformin prolonged-release 2,000 mg orally with the evening meal and dapagliflozin 10 mg orally daily for type 2 diabetes. eGFR values over 3 months are 39, 38 and 38 mL/min/1.73 m². She is well hydrated without acute illness or hypoxia; HbA1c is 50 mmol/mol against an agreed 48–58 target. Her metformin tablets contain 500 mg.

  1. Identify the stable renal category rather than assuming an acute kidney injury from one result. The supplied repeated eGFR values place her in the selected metformin product’s 30–44 band, which permits a maximum total of 1,000 mg per day.
  2. Compare prescribed exposure with that ceiling: 2,000 mg daily is 1,000 mg above the permitted maximum. The revised 1,000 mg dose is two 500 mg prolonged-release tablets, representing a 50% reduction from the current daily amount.
  3. Give the final medicine action: reduce metformin prolonged release to 1,000 mg orally with the evening meal and update the supply instructions. Review dapagliflozin separately; reduced glucose efficacy at this eGFR does not automatically remove its eligible protective role in this stable patient.
  4. Arrange review of tolerability, glucose symptoms and renal trajectory, with repeat HbA1c around 3 months for this illustrative stable plan and earlier assessment if illness develops. Independently verify two 500 mg tablets equal 1,000 mg, confirm the old four-tablet instruction is inactive and explain the change and sick-day contact plan to the patient.

Key medicines

Metformin prolonged release after the supplied renal reviewFor the stable worked case, 1,000 mg orally with the evening meal each day, supplied as two 500 mg prolonged-release tablets, replacing the previous 2,000 mg daily instruction.Below GFR 30 this product is contraindicated. Acute dehydration, hypoxia or serious illness can require a hold irrespective of the stable chronic dose; review liver risk, alcohol exposure and other causes of lactic-acidosis vulnerability.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status8 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom