Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMSRAMRCGP

Long-term condition review

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Conduct proactive, person-centred reviews that assess disease control, treatment safety, function and self-management, close monitoring loops and produce a coordinated plan.

  • A long-term-condition review is a clinical reassessment, not a template-completion event; begin with current concerns, goals and change since the last review.
  • Check urgent deterioration and diagnostic fit before assuming every symptom belongs to the established condition.
  • Prepare by obtaining only condition- and medicine-specific observations or tests that will change the consultation, with clear result ownership.

Reasoning priorities

01
Pre-review record synthesis

Identify trajectory, outstanding work and decision-relevant tests.

Resolve urgent abnormalities before the appointment and avoid tests with no clear question or owner.

Worked reasoning

Worked case: apparent treatment resistanceVerify before intensifying

A patient with chronic airway disease reports poor control despite repeated prescription escalation and has had two urgent visits.

  1. Assess current instability and alternative diagnoses, then establish symptom pattern, exacerbations, smoking, exposures, comorbidity and actual medicine access.
  2. Observe inhaler technique, check device suitability, adherence, refill history and the accuracy of the diagnosis and objective tests before calling disease resistant.
  3. Agree the final action: correct technique and access barriers, optimise only according to current condition-specific guidance and arrange urgent or specialist assessment if severity or diagnostic uncertainty requires it.
  4. Verify with a defined symptom and exacerbation review, repeat objective measurement when indicated, prescription reconciliation and active follow-up if the patient cannot be contacted.
Routine proactive reviewPrepare, assess, agree and close

A stable patient reaches the planned condition-review interval.

Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom