Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.
Full textbookMSRAMRCGP

Palliative and end-of-life care at home

Recognise changing needs, relieve symptoms, support informed preferences and carers, coordinate round-the-clock community care and respond safely to deterioration without reducing end-of-life care to anticipatory prescribing.

Saved on this device
Open the sections you need. The overview is shown first.
01Principles and purposeThe professional or clinical skill and the decisions it supports.

Palliative care improves quality of life for people with serious illness and those close to them. It can accompany active treatment and includes physical, psychological, social and spiritual support, planning and reliable coordination.

Recognition is probabilistic. Look for deteriorating performance, increasing dependence, recurrent admissions, progressive symptoms, reduced intake, weight loss, frailty, disease-specific markers and the clinician’s concern that death in the coming months would not be surprising. A change may signal the last days, but it may also represent infection, retention, constipation, uncontrolled pain, dehydration, hypercalcaemia, medicine toxicity or another reversible problem. Assess before labelling.

NICE NG31 advises recognising possible entry into the last days using signs such as agitation, Cheyne–Stokes breathing, declining consciousness, mottled skin, noisy respiratory secretions, progressive weight loss and increasing fatigue, while acknowledging uncertainty. Improvement or temporary stabilisation can occur. Explain this uncertainty in plain language and review frequently rather than presenting an exact prognosis as fact.

Start with the person. Ask what they understand, how much detail they want, what they fear, what matters today and who should participate. Some want to remain at home; others prioritise rapid symptom relief or avoiding burden on family. Preferred place of care is not a promise that can be guaranteed regardless of changing need. Revisit it when symptoms, caregiver capacity or available services change.

Communication should be paced and specific. Give a warning shot, share what is known and uncertain, pause, check understanding and invite questions. Avoid euphemisms if they obscure that someone may be dying. Use professional interpreters and accessible communication aids. Record the conversation, including what the person did not wish to discuss, without equating silence with consent.

Advance care planning records values, escalation preferences and who should be involved. Legal powers and advance refusals depend on jurisdiction: the Mental Capacity Act framework applies in England and Wales, with distinct legislation elsewhere in the UK. Verify the scope and validity of any proxy or advance decision. A decision against CPR concerns that intervention; it does not itself prohibit other appropriate treatment or assessment.

Symptom assessment remains diagnostic. For pain, identify site, quality, severity, incident component and cause, plus current opioid exposure and renal function. For breathlessness, assess distress, oxygen saturation when useful and reversible contributors such as bronchospasm, effusion, pulmonary oedema, anaemia or anxiety. For agitation, consider pain, retention, constipation, delirium, medicine effects, fear and environment. For nausea, mechanism guides treatment.

Non-drug measures matter. Repositioning, a calm environment, fan or airflow, relaxation, mouth care, pressure care and explanation may provide rapid comfort. Enable activity or rest according to preference. Family members need teaching about expected changes and clear instructions on whom to call; they should not be left to decide medication doses without an authorised plan and training.

Anticipatory prescribing prepares for likely symptoms when oral administration may become difficult. NICE recommends individualising likely indications, drug choice, dose and route using current symptoms, previous medicines, renal and hepatic function, allergies, interaction risk and the care setting. Availability of a prescription is not permission to administer automatically: a trained clinician should assess the current symptom and follow the authorised directions and local governance.

Avoid a generic four-drug formula. Opioid choice and dose depend on opioid exposure, renal function and symptom; sedatives and antipsychotics have indication-specific cautions; antisecretory medicines are not needed for everyone. Consult the current BNF and local palliative formulary or specialist team for exact agent and dose. The safest national teaching is the decision process, not a blanket regimen detached from patient factors.

When symptoms require repeated as-needed doses or swallowing fails, seek specialist or community-nursing input and consider continuous subcutaneous infusion under local protocol. Calculate the existing 24-hour exposure, account for route conversion and breakthrough doses and obtain independent checking where policy requires. Do not improvise conversion ratios from memory. Review the syringe driver, site, compatibility and symptom response.

For breathlessness in the last days, NICE NG31 says not to start oxygen routinely; use it for symptomatic hypoxaemia. Positioning, airflow, reassurance and treatment of reversible contributors may help. Opioids or benzodiazepines may be considered in appropriate circumstances under the guideline and individual prescribing, but medicine choice, dose and combination require clinical assessment. Sedation is not the aim of routine breathlessness treatment.

Clinically assisted hydration is an individual trial decision. Discuss possible benefits and burdens, current thirst, swallowing, pulmonary oedema risk and preferences. Mouth care can relieve dryness even when hydration is not used. Review any trial for benefit or harm and stop or reduce it if fluid overload or discomfort develops. Do not state that fluids always prolong dying or that they never help.

Care coordination determines whether home care succeeds. Share an up-to-date plan with general practice, community nursing, specialist palliative care, ambulance and out-of-hours services through available systems. Confirm pharmacy access, controlled-drug arrangements, equipment, continence supplies and who can administer medicines. NICE quality standards expect access to health professionals able to access records and care plans 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Support carers as people with needs, not as an unlimited workforce. Ask what they can safely do, sleep, health, cultural practices, financial pressures and whether they know how to get urgent help. Offer respite and bereavement information through local services. If home becomes unsafe or symptom control cannot be delivered, discuss alternatives without framing transfer as failure.

Verification closes the plan. Name who will visit, when symptoms will be reviewed, how medication administration is authorised, and what should trigger urgent contact or hospital transfer if consistent with goals. After death, follow local verification and certification processes, care for the family and communicate with involved services. Reflect on expected and unexpected events without implying that all deterioration was preventable.

Key points

  • Palliative care can begin alongside disease-modifying treatment; “end of life” must not be used as a reason to stop active symptom assessment.
  • Recognise possible deterioration from trajectory, function, intake, consciousness and escalating care needs, and explain uncertainty honestly.
  • Ask what matters, where the person wishes to be cared for, who should be involved and what trade-offs are acceptable; preferences can change.
  • Assess capacity for the particular decision and support communication. In England and Wales apply the Mental Capacity Act; elsewhere use the relevant national legal framework, including the applicable rules for advance decisions and proxies.
  • Treat reversible causes when this matches goals: pain, retention, constipation, infection, medicine toxicity and hypercalcaemia can mimic inevitable dying.
  • Anticipatory medicines are individual prescriptions, not a fixed bundle; consider likely symptoms, current drugs, route, renal and hepatic function, allergies and local administration support.
  • Do not routinely start oxygen for breathlessness in the last days of life; consider it for symptomatic hypoxaemia and use non-drug and cause-directed measures.
  • Provide named daytime and out-of-hours contacts, document plans where services can access them, and verify that medicines, equipment and professional support are actually available.
02Situations and prioritiesThe context, relevant information and actions that matter most.
Possible last days of life

Progressive decline, reduced intake, altered breathing, mottling and consciousness change may indicate dying but require review for reversible causes and uncertainty.

Uncontrolled symptom crisisRed flag

Severe pain, breathlessness, bleeding, seizures or agitation needs rapid assessment and treatment through the agreed urgent pathway.

Reversible mimic

Urinary retention, constipation, infection, medicine toxicity, hypoglycaemia or hypercalcaemia may present as deterioration or agitation.

Caregiver exhaustion

Inability to sleep, fear of administration or physical incapacity may make a nominal home plan unsafe and needs urgent support.

Route failure

Dysphagia, vomiting or reduced consciousness makes oral treatment unreliable and should prompt authorised alternative-route planning.

System failure risk

No out-of-hours record, inaccessible medicines or unclear administration responsibility can convert a manageable symptom into a crisis.

03Assessment and interpretationHow to gather information, assess the situation and recognise uncertainty.
Reasoning sequence

Consider the information, its meaning and its limitations before deciding what follows.

  1. 01
    Focused clinical assessment
    Why
    Identify symptom mechanism, reversible causes and whether dying is likely.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Investigate only when results could change care consistent with goals; do not assume all change is irreversible.
  2. 02
    Medication and route reconciliation
    Why
    Establish current 24-hour exposure, omissions, recent changes and feasible administration.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Include patches, as-needed use and specialist prescriptions; conversions need current references and checking.
  3. 03
    Oxygen saturation when it will change care
    Why
    Identify symptomatic hypoxaemia in breathlessness.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Distress and saturation are not interchangeable; oxygen is not routinely indicated for non-hypoxaemic breathlessness.
  4. 04
    Capacity and advance-plan review
    Why
    Identify who decides and any applicable prior decisions.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Capacity is decision- and time-specific; distinguish advance statement, advance refusal, proxy authority and DNACPR.
  5. 05
    Home-care readiness check
    Why
    Verify medicines, equipment, carers and 24-hour access.
    Interpretation and limitations
    A documented preference without deliverable resources is not yet a safe plan.
04Worked approachesCases with ordered reasoning, an action and a check of the outcome.
01Worked case: breathlessness at home overnightRelieve distress and make the plan executableA person with advanced cancer, assessed as entering the last days of life, becomes breathless at home; oxygen saturation is 95%, anticipatory medicines are present, and the family is unsure what to do.
  1. 1Assess remotely only as far as safe and arrange urgent in-person review based on distress: clarify onset, chest pain, bleeding, fever, breathing effort, consciousness, goals and the existing escalation plan; call emergency services for immediate threat.
  2. 2At assessment, reason through reversible contributors and symptom burden; recognise that normal-range saturation provides no indication for routine oxygen and confirm what prescribed medicine, route and administration authority actually exist.
  3. 3Take the final action: use positioning, airflow and reassurance, treat a reversible cause when aligned with goals, and have the authorised trained clinician give individually prescribed symptom medicine or seek specialist advice rather than asking family to improvise.
  4. 4Verify relief within a defined interval, ensure 24-hour contacts and records are accessible, check medicine supply and caregiver ability, and escalate to specialist palliative care, hospice or hospital if symptoms remain uncontrolled or home care is unsafe.
02Possible last daysAssess, communicate and review uncertaintyFunction and intake decline with increasing drowsiness.
  1. 1Assess for signs of dying and reversible causes that would alter goal-concordant treatment.
  2. 2Explain likelihood and uncertainty, elicit priorities and review advance decisions and capacity.
  3. 3Create and share an individual symptom, hydration, monitoring and out-of-hours plan with a named review.
03Oral route failsReconcile before changing routeThe person can no longer swallow regular medicines.
  1. 1List each medicine, purpose, recent dose, formulation, renal or hepatic constraints and withdrawal risk.
  2. 2Stop low-benefit burdens and convert essential or symptom medicines using current references and specialist support.
  3. 3Verify authorised administration, compatibility, device or site checks and response.
05Feedback, follow-up and evidenceReview outcomes, seek feedback and identify what to improve.
  • Review comfort, alertness and symptom mechanism after every important treatment change.
  • Record as-needed doses and whether repeated use triggers specialist review or infusion planning.
  • Check hydration trials for benefit, pulmonary oedema, secretions or discomfort.
  • Confirm anticipatory medicines, equipment and trained administration remain available.
  • Revisit preferred place, escalation and resuscitation decisions as circumstances change.
  • Assess caregiver capacity, sleep and access to 24-hour advice.
  • Share updated plans and verify receipt across daytime and out-of-hours teams.
06Special situationsVariants, exceptions and circumstances that change the usual approach.

Palliative is concurrent

Symptom support can accompany active cancer, organ-failure or neurological treatment.

DNACPR is specific

It applies to CPR, not to all investigations, antibiotics, admission or basic care.

Oxygen treats hypoxaemia

Breathlessness intensity does not reliably track saturation; routine oxygen may burden without benefit.

Anticipatory means ready

It does not mean every prescribed medicine should be given or that assessment has ended.

Coordination is treatment

A correct prescription inaccessible overnight is not an effective home-care plan.

07Common pitfallsFrequent interpretation and management errors.
  1. 01

    Do not diagnose dying without considering reversible causes.

  2. 02

    Do not promise an exact prognosis or guaranteed preferred place of death.

  3. 03

    Do not equate DNACPR with no active treatment.

  4. 04

    Do not use routine oxygen for non-hypoxaemic breathlessness.

  5. 05

    Do not prescribe or teach a fixed anticipatory drug bundle irrespective of renal function and prior exposure.

  6. 06

    Do not convert opioids or infusion routes from memory.

  7. 07

    Do not assume relatives can administer medicines without authority, training and willingness.

  8. 08

    Do not stop steroids, insulin, anticonvulsants or other high-risk medicines abruptly without review.

Practice

Two practice questions

Question 1 of 20 correct
Primary care and public healthOriginal SBA

Anticipatory prescribing principle

Which is the safest approach to anticipatory prescribing for a person expected to deteriorate at home? The plan must remain safe if swallowing becomes difficult and symptoms change.

Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom