Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLASJTMSRAMRCPMRCGP

Prioritisation and teamwork under pressure

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device

Synopsis

Prioritise simultaneous demands by clinical risk and time sensitivity, build a shared team picture, delegate with explicit limits and follow-up, and preserve humane communication when workload exceeds immediate capacity.

  • Triage by threat to life or function, deterioration risk and time-critical benefit—not arrival order, hierarchy, convenience or who is most forceful.
  • Make the workload visible early. State the risk, request specific help and agree who is doing what by when instead of silently carrying an unsafe queue.
  • Delegate only to someone with appropriate competence, information, authority and capacity; clarify escalation triggers and retain responsibility for checking completion.

Reasoning priorities

01
Risk and time-sensitivity matrix

Rank concurrent demands by harm if delayed and reversibility.

Immediate instability and narrow therapeutic or safeguarding windows rise first. Reassess after each new clinical fact rather than preserving the original queue.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseThree simultaneous demands on call

A doctor is reviewing a stable discharge when a nurse reports new hypotension in one patient, the laboratory phones a critical potassium for another, and a colleague asks for routine paperwork.

  1. Acknowledge all three and immediately attend or summon appropriate senior help for the hypotensive patient. Ask the nurse for current observations and emergency support while keeping the critical result visible and identifying another competent clinician.
  2. Delegate prompt assessment and action on the critical potassium with patient identifiers, relevant context, required read-back and escalation triggers; verify that the colleague accepts. Defer the routine paperwork and explain a realistic time.
  3. Reassess the unstable patient, communicate with the team and update priorities as findings emerge. If staffing cannot cover both clinical risks, activate the next escalation tier rather than attempting unsafe parallel work.
  4. Final action: ensure both urgent patients have named plans and senior oversight, then complete or reassign the discharge and paperwork according to revised risk and deadlines.
  5. Verification: obtain confirmation of the potassium action and repeat plan, reconcile results and documentation, hand over outstanding tasks explicitly and report any unsafe capacity failure.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom