DPDoctor's PassportEducation
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
RapidMLAMSRAFoundationGP

Best-interests decision-making and least restriction

Essential points for quick revision.

!
Immediate treatment before full consultation

Serious deterioration may make delay unsafe, but emergency best-interests action must remain necessary, proportionate and compatible with any known valid refusal or court decision.

Action: Search rapidly for advance decisions and authorised proxies, involve the person as far as possible and provide only treatment needed to prevent serious harm while wider evidence is gathered. Document urgency, alternatives, restraint and review, and seek immediate senior or legal advice for disputed life-sustaining treatment or uncertain authority.

Synopsis

Make transparent, lawful decisions when a person cannot decide, first respecting valid prior authority, then centring wishes, values, clinical options, consultation and the least restrictive effective course under the correct UK jurisdiction.

  • Confirm that capacity is absent for the specific decision after practicable support and consider whether the choice can wait for recovery.
  • Check first for a valid applicable advance refusal, health-and-welfare attorney, deputy, guardian or court order and verify the exact scope of authority.
  • In England and Wales, encourage participation and consider all relevant circumstances, present and past wishes, values, beliefs and the views of appropriate people.

Key red flags

A valid and applicable advance decision refusing treatment in England and Wales is binding and cannot be replaced by a clinician's or family's view of best interests.

Investigation priorities

01
Capacity and timing confirmationFirst step

Verify inability for this decision and whether safe delay could restore personal decision making.

Management branches

Best-interests processAuthority first, then person-centred balance

The patient cannot make the specified decision and safe delay will not restore capacity in time.

  1. Check binding refusals, proxy or court authority and involve the person using the best available communication and support.
  2. Gather wishes, values, professional evidence and appropriate consultation, then compare all clinically available options and no action.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status6 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom