Overview
Apply the all-age MEED framework to identify impending risk to life, choose an appropriate admission setting, and avoid false reassurance from weight, appearance or isolated normal tests.
Eating-disorder emergencies are often missed because the person is walking, conversing or not visibly underweight. Starvation can blunt ordinary inflammatory and cardiovascular responses, while purging can cause abrupt biochemical danger at any weight. The MEED framework therefore examines multiple domains: trajectory and age-adjusted weight, cardiovascular observations, hydration, temperature, muscle function, ECG, biochemical and haematological findings, intake and behaviours, engagement, exercise, purging, self-harm and support. No single domain safely describes the whole risk.
MEED uses green, amber and red to signal low, alert and high impending risk to life. It states that one or more red ratings or two or more amber ratings should probably be considered high risk, but also warns that a red item in one domain is not necessarily equivalent to another. Use the framework to structure senior clinical judgement, not to automate admission or discharge. Repeat measures when technique, anxiety, recent activity, water loading or concealed behaviour could distort them.