Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
QuestionsFlashcardsBriefsDashboardAccount
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Safeguarding and supported decision-making

Psychiatry · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Immediate danger and urgent protection

Serious assault, sexual violence, strangulation, poisoning, forced medication, severe neglect, trafficking, coercive control, missing person risk or life-threatening self-neglect requires urgent medical and protective action while preserving evidence and communication.

Action: Move to immediate safety when possible, call emergency services, treat injuries, speak with the adult privately using accessible communication, follow forensic and local safeguarding procedures, and document facts, wishes, capacity and information-sharing reasons contemporaneously.

Synopsis

Recognise abuse, neglect and exploitation without equating disability with incapacity, centre the adult's desired outcomes, and combine lawful safeguarding action with supported, decision-specific choice and least restriction.

  • Safeguarding protects an adult's right to live in safety, free from abuse and neglect, while promoting wellbeing, wishes, feelings, beliefs and proportionality.
  • In England, Care Act section 42 duties apply when an adult has care and support needs, is experiencing or at risk of abuse or neglect, and because of those needs cannot protect themselves.
  • Abuse may be physical, sexual, psychological, financial, discriminatory, domestic, organisational, modern slavery, neglect or self-neglect; several forms often coexist.
  • Speak to the adult privately and accessibly, establish desired outcomes and immediate danger, preserve evidence, record facts and consult local safeguarding leadership without promising absolute confidentiality.
  • Learning disability never proves incapacity. Presume capacity, remove communication barriers and assess only the specific relevant decision if genuine doubt remains.
  • A capacitous adult may choose risk, but coercion, crime, risk to others and public-interest information sharing still require separate analysis and proportionate action.
  • When capacity is absent, comply with applicable advance decisions and verify authorised decision-makers, otherwise make and record the overall best-interests decision with advocacy; before acting, consider whether the purpose can be achieved as effectively in a way less restrictive of the person's rights and freedom.

Key red flags

Injuries inconsistent with the account, repeated delayed presentation, genital injury, strangulation signs, malnutrition, pressure damage, medication discrepancies or fearful behaviour around one person require direct safeguarding enquiry.

A supporter who answers every question, prevents private contact, controls money, communication, medication or relationships, or threatens withdrawal of care may be coercive rather than protective.

Organisational neglect can appear as missed healthcare, excessive restraint, unsafe staffing, blanket restrictions, poor nutrition, financial misuse or repeated failure to implement reasonable adjustments.

A disclosure of abuse, current suicidal intent, access by the alleged perpetrator, children or other adults at risk, or inability to return safely needs same-day escalation.

Apparent agreement obtained when information is inaccessible, the person is frightened or another person is directing answers does not establish valid consent.

Investigation priorities

01
Private accessible safeguarding historyFirst step

Establish the adult's account, desired outcomes, immediate danger, coercion and risks to other people.

Management branches

First concernHear, protect and preserve

Disclosure, injury, changed behaviour or service information raises possible abuse, neglect or exploitation.

  1. Address immediate medical danger, arrange private accessible communication, explain confidentiality limits and establish what the adult wants to happen.
  2. Record factual observations and exact disclosure, preserve evidence without investigative leading questions and assess perpetrator access and risks to others.
  3. Follow local safeguarding and emergency procedures promptly, sharing proportionate information and involving police or specialist services when indicated.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • Care and support statutory guidanceEngland adult-safeguarding duties, abuse categories, proportionality, involvement and information sharing.
  • Care Act 2014 section 42Statutory local-authority enquiry threshold in England.
  • NICE NG108 decision-making and mental capacitySupported choice, capacity assessment, best interests, advocacy and recording.
  • Mental Capacity Act 2005 section 1Presumption, practicable support, unwise decisions, best interests and least restriction in England and Wales.
  • Independent Mental Capacity Advocate guidanceCurrent statutory advocacy role and representation in specified decisions.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom