Overview
Recognise membranous nephropathy, separate primary immune disease from secondary causes, and coordinate risk-based supportive and specialist treatment safely.
Membranous nephropathy thickens glomerular capillary walls because immune deposits form beneath podocytes. Complement-associated podocyte damage disrupts the filtration barrier, producing albumin-predominant proteinuria, oedema, hyperlipidaemia and increased thrombotic susceptibility. Primary disease is commonly associated with autoantibodies to podocyte antigens, especially PLA2R; other antigens and secondary immune triggers create a heterogeneous clinicopathological diagnosis.
A complete assessment asks three parallel questions: is this truly membranous nephropathy, is there a treatable secondary driver, and how likely is untreated disease to cause serious harm? Kidney biopsy remains important when serology and phenotype are discordant, kidney function is falling, another process is possible, or tissue will change therapy. Histology, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy and antigen staining should be interpreted together.
Management is not synonymous with immediate immunosuppression. Some people remit with supportive care, whereas persistent nephrotic syndrome, declining eGFR, high immunological activity or major complications justify specialist disease-modifying treatment. The choice among rituximab and other immunosuppressive strategies depends on risk category, comorbidity, previous exposure, fertility, infection screening and the current renal-unit protocol.
Aetiology
Primary autoimmune disease
Autoantibodies against podocyte-associated antigens, commonly PLA2R in the appropriate phenotype, generate in-situ subepithelial immune complexes along capillary walls.
Systemic secondary disease
Hepatitis, autoimmune disease and malignancy can produce a membranous pattern, so clinical context and biopsy antigen findings remain important even when proteinuria dominates.
Medicine-associated disease
Selected medicines can trigger subepithelial immune deposition; a dated exposure history and improvement after withdrawal help assess causality without deliberate rechallenge.
Pathophysiology
- 1Subepithelial immune-complex formation
Antibodies bind podocyte antigens or planted antigens beneath epithelial cells, creating deposits along the outer glomerular capillary wall.
- 2Complement-mediated podocyte injury
Local complement activation disrupts podocyte cytoskeleton and slit-diaphragm integrity without the prominent endocapillary inflammation seen in nephritic disease.
- 3Heavy protein leakage
Loss of filtration selectivity permits substantial albumin loss, producing hypoalbuminaemia, oedema and compensatory hepatic lipid and coagulation-protein synthesis.
- 4Remission or chronic scarring
Immune activity may subside spontaneously or with treatment, but persistent deposits and proteinuria can drive glomerulosclerosis and declining filtration.
Clinical features and red flags
Progressive dependent oedema, frothy urine, marked albuminuria, low serum albumin and hyperlipidaemia form the characteristic clinical syndrome.
Sudden pleuritic pain, hypoxia, unilateral leg swelling or loin pain may indicate pulmonary, deep venous or renal-vein thrombosis.
Active urinary casts, systemic inflammation or a rapid creatinine rise should prompt consideration of superimposed crescentic disease, infection or another diagnosis.
Weight loss, lymphadenopathy, rash, arthralgia, chronic infection risk or exposure to implicated medicines changes the diagnostic and treatment pathway.
Fever or focal symptoms in nephrotic or immunosuppressed patients warrant prompt assessment because urinary immunoglobulin loss and treatment both increase risk.
Investigations
- 01
Urine ACR or PCR and urinalysisFirst step - Why
- Quantify protein loss and identify blood or an active sediment.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Repeat a standardised quantitative measure for trajectory; haematuria can occur, but cellular casts or abrupt change demand reassessment for an additional lesion.
- 02
Creatinine, eGFR, albumin and lipid profile - Why
- Stage kidney impairment and document nephrotic complications.
- Interpretation and limitations
- A stable eGFR does not imply low risk when proteinuria and hypoalbuminaemia persist; trends after haemodynamic therapy need clinical context.
- 03
Serum anti-PLA2R antibody - Why
- Support diagnosis and provide an immunological activity marker in appropriate patients.
- Interpretation and limitations
- A positive result is persuasive in a typical phenotype, whereas a negative test can reflect another antigen, low activity or secondary disease and must not end evaluation.
- 04
Secondary-cause screen - Why
- Look for infection, autoimmunity, malignancy and medicine associations that alter treatment.
- Interpretation and limitations
- Tailor hepatitis serology, ANA/complement, paraprotein studies and age-appropriate cancer assessment to history and examination rather than ordering an indiscriminate panel.
- 05
Differential diagnosis
Minimal change disease
Both can produce abrupt bland nephrosis, but minimal change disease lacks subepithelial deposits and capillary-wall immune staining on biopsy.
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis
Segmental scars and an adaptive, genetic or primary podocyte context support FSGS rather than diffuse subepithelial immune-complex disease.
Renal amyloidosis
Systemic deposition clues, monoclonal studies and Congo-red-positive fibrils distinguish amyloid from the granular capillary-wall deposits of membranous nephropathy.
Diabetic kidney disease
Longstanding diabetes with retinopathy and gradual albuminuria supports diabetic glomerulosclerosis, while abrupt nephrosis or disease-specific antibodies prompt assessment for membranous disease.
Management
01ConfirmEstablish diagnosis and causeFirst stepAn adult has heavy albuminuria with suspected nephrotic syndrome.+
- 1Confirm quantitative proteinuria, serum albumin, renal trajectory and clinical complications while reviewing previous results.
- 2Request anti-PLA2R and a history-led secondary screen, including prescribed and non-prescribed medicines, infection risks and malignancy symptoms.
- 3Discuss biopsy with nephrology when serology is negative or discordant, renal function falls, another lesion is plausible, or tissue classification will guide treatment.
02ProtectReduce immediate nephrotic harmMembranous nephropathy is likely or confirmed and the patient is clinically stable.+
- 1Optimise blood pressure and antiproteinuric therapy cautiously, checking creatinine and potassium after renin–angiotensin system changes.
Complications
Venous thromboembolism
Urinary anticoagulant-protein loss and increased procoagulant synthesis raise deep-vein, pulmonary and renal-vein thrombosis risk during severe nephrosis.
Serious infection
Immunoglobulin loss, oedematous tissue and immunosuppressive exposure can reduce host defence, sometimes blunting the clinical presentation.
Acute kidney injury
Hypovolaemia, sepsis, renal-vein thrombosis, interstitial oedema or treatment toxicity can abruptly reduce filtration on top of the glomerular lesion.
Progressive chronic kidney disease
Persistent immune activity and proteinuria cause glomerular and interstitial scarring, eventually reducing filtration despite an initially preserved eGFR.
Severe oedema
Low oncotic pressure and renal sodium retention can produce anasarca, effusions and impaired mobility while intravascular filling remains clinically variable.
Monitoring and follow-up
- Trend the same quantitative urine protein measure, serum albumin, creatinine and eGFR at intervals matched to severity and recent treatment changes.
- Record blood pressure, weight, oedema and postural symptoms because over-diuresis can worsen kidney perfusion before oedema has resolved.
- Follow anti-PLA2R titres when initially positive, recognising that immunological response may occur before proteinuria remits.
- Check potassium and renal function after antiproteinuric medicine titration and during intercurrent illness or reduced intake.
- After immunosuppression, use the live protocol for blood counts, immunoglobulins, infection surveillance and vaccine planning.
- Revisit thrombosis risk whenever albumin, mobility, bleeding risk, surgery, previous thrombosis or nephrotic severity changes.
Special situations
Serology and tissue complement each other
PLA2R positivity can establish an immune signal, but biopsy still answers chronicity, competing pathology and antigen-discordance questions in selected cases.
Immunological remission comes first
Falling antibody activity may precede repair of the filtration barrier, so early persistent proteinuria does not automatically mean treatment failure.
Renal-vein thrombosis can be subtle
New flank discomfort, haematuria or unexplained kidney deterioration in severe nephrosis deserves deliberate vascular consideration.
Secondary disease changes the target
Treating infection, malignancy or a causal medicine may be more important than applying a primary-disease immunosuppressive algorithm.
Albumin is not a stand-alone anticoagulation rule
Assay method, bleeding probability and individual thrombotic factors must accompany serum albumin in prophylaxis decisions.
Common pitfalls
- 01
Calling all PLA2R-negative membranous nephropathy secondary without considering other podocyte antigens or timing of testing.
- 02
Starting immunosuppression before excluding chronic infection and clinically indicated malignancy assessment.
- 03
Using one low albumin result as an automatic instruction for anticoagulation without estimating bleeding harm.
- 04
Interpreting a haemodynamic eGFR dip after supportive therapy as definite immune progression without repeat assessment.
- 05
Escalating loop diuretics despite hypotension and intravascular depletion because visible oedema remains.
- 06
Assuming that persistent proteinuria immediately after antibody improvement proves rituximab failure.