Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Respiratory · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Escalate

A person with IPF who develops marked new breathlessness, hypoxaemia, chest pain, fever, haemoptysis or rapidly increasing oxygen requirement needs urgent hospital assessment. Manage immediate respiratory failure and seek infection, pulmonary embolism, cardiac failure, pneumothorax and other causes before labelling an acute exacerbation; obtain early respiratory and critical-care advice consistent with documented preferences and treatment ceilings.

Synopsis

Recognise the characteristic fibrotic presentation, establish idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis through multidisciplinary exclusion of alternatives and deliver safe antifibrotic and supportive care.

  • IPF is a chronic progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, usually occurring in older adults and confined to the lungs.
  • Typical clues are insidious exertional breathlessness, dry cough, fine basal inspiratory crackles, clubbing and a restrictive or gas-transfer defect.
  • The diagnosis requires exclusion of domestic, occupational, medicine and connective-tissue causes; 'idiopathic' is not established by HRCT alone.
  • A usual interstitial pneumonia pattern favours subpleural basal reticulation, traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing, without features suggesting an alternative diagnosis.
  • When clinical context and HRCT are sufficiently characteristic, surgical lung biopsy is unnecessary and may expose the patient to serious harm.
  • Antifibrotics slow physiological decline but do not reverse established fibrosis; benefits, adverse effects and stopping rules should be discussed honestly.
  • Nintedanib and pirfenidone eligibility follows current NICE technology appraisals, specialist prescribing and local commissioning arrangements.
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation, smoking cessation, vaccination, oxygen assessment and symptom-focused care should begin alongside disease-modifying discussion.
  • Serial decline, exertional desaturation and pulmonary hypertension matter prognostically even if resting saturation or spirometric volumes appear acceptable.
  • Lung transplantation should be considered early enough for assessment in potentially suitable patients, rather than after irreversible deconditioning or crisis.
  • Key red flags

    Acute exacerbation syndrome

    New severe dyspnoea over usually less than one month with new bilateral ground-glass opacity or consolidation superimposed on UIP is life-threatening after oedema and other causes are addressed.

    Pulmonary vascular complication

    Breathlessness, syncope, oedema or oxygen need disproportionate to lung volumes raises pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary embolism or cardiac disease and warrants prompt specialist evaluation.

    Investigation priorities

    01
    High-resolution computed tomographyFirst step

    Determine whether the fibrosis has a UIP probability pattern.

    Management branches

    DiagnosisConfirm IPF without unnecessary biopsy

    Chronic fibrotic ILD is suspected in an appropriate adult.

    1. Document clinical tempo, smoking, full medicine and exposure histories, and targeted connective-tissue findings; obtain complete physiology and protocolled HRCT.
    2. Present clinical and radiological evidence at an ILD multidisciplinary meeting to judge UIP pattern, credible causes and diagnostic confidence.
    3. If confidence remains insufficient and the answer would alter care, consider lavage or tissue only after individual procedural and exacerbation risk is discussed.
    4. Communicate the working diagnosis, uncertainty, likely course and contact route in plain language, with a plan to revisit unexpected features.

    Key medicines

    NintedanibSpecialist initiation is normally 150 mg orally twice daily approximately twelve hours apart with food; reduce to 100 mg twice daily, interrupt or discontinue for intolerance as directed by the current SmPC.Check liver function before and during treatment. Diarrhoea and nausea are common; dehydration, bleeding, arterial thromboembolism and gastrointestinal perforation risks require context. Avoid in pregnancy and review anticoagulants, hepatic impairment and interacting medicines.
    PirfenidoneSpecialist-supervised titration over fourteen days: 267 mg three times daily for days 1–7, 534 mg three times daily for days 8–14, then 801 mg three times daily with food, subject to current product instructions.Obtain liver tests before treatment, monthly for six months and then every three months unless more frequent review is indicated. Counsel on nausea, anorexia, photosensitivity, sun protection, smoking-related reduced exposure and important CYP1A2 interactions.
    Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
    Sources and review status5 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
    Sources

    Sources and review status

    National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

    • NICE CG163 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisUK diagnostic, information, supportive-care and follow-up recommendations.
    • NICE TA864 nintedanib for IPFEngland treatment eligibility for IPF with preserved forced vital capacity.
    • NICE TA504 pirfenidone for IPFEngland technology-appraisal recommendation and stopping framework.
    • Ofev summary of product characteristicsCurrent licensed adult dosing, contraindications, interactions and monitoring.
    • Esbriet summary of product characteristicsCurrent titration, liver surveillance and photosensitivity precautions.

    Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

    Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom