Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Pulmonary fungal infection in the immunocompromised patient

Respiratory · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Escalate

A severely immunocompromised patient with new hypoxaemia, haemoptysis, pleuritic pain or compatible CT change needs urgent specialist assessment, sampling that does not delay care and prompt empiric antifungal treatment when invasive disease is strongly suspected.

Synopsis

Recognise invasive pulmonary fungal disease as a time-critical syndrome, combine host risk, CT, biomarkers and respiratory sampling, and start species-directed antifungal treatment with expert support without waiting for perfect proof. Treatment must be individualised with haematology, transplant, HIV, respiratory, microbiology and pharmacy input.

  • Prolonged neutropenia, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, solid-organ transplantation, high-dose or prolonged corticosteroids and major T-cell suppression create different fungal risks.
  • Persistent or recurrent fever despite broad antibacterial therapy may be the only early sign; cough, pleuritic pain or haemoptysis can appear late.
  • Urgent thin-section CT is more sensitive than a chest radiograph: nodules, halo sign, wedge-shaped infarcts, cavitation or reversed halo should accelerate specialist review.
  • Serum and BAL galactomannan support invasive aspergillosis in the right host; beta-D-glucan is nonspecific and may be negative in mucormycosis.
  • Send BAL or tissue for microscopy, fungal culture, molecular testing and biomarkers where safe, but do not delay treatment in a high-risk deteriorating patient.
  • Voriconazole is a usual first-line medicine for invasive aspergillosis; suspected Mucorales requires a mould-active alternative such as liposomal amphotericin B and urgent expert input.
  • Azoles have major CYP interactions, variable exposure and QT effects; therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacy reconciliation are core treatment, not optional extras.
  • Reverse modifiable immune suppression, recover neutrophils where possible and consider surgical source control for selected localised Mucorales disease or life-threatening haemoptysis.

Key red flags

High-risk febrile host

Persistent or recrudescent fever during prolonged neutropenia, after allogeneic transplantation or under intensive corticosteroid or T-cell suppressive therapy should trigger urgent fungal-risk review even with a normal chest radiograph.

Angioinvasive phenotype

Pleuritic pain, haemoptysis, hypoxaemia and CT nodules with surrounding ground glass or wedge-shaped infarcts suggest vascular invasion. Major bleeding or rapidly rising oxygen need is an emergency.

Investigation priorities

01
Urgent thin-section CT chestFirst step

Detect early nodules, halo or reversed-halo patterns, infarcts, cavitation, airway lesions and a target for BAL or biopsy.

Management branches

EscalateProbable invasive fungal pneumonia

A high-risk host has persistent fever or respiratory deterioration with compatible CT findings.

  1. Stabilise oxygenation and sepsis physiology, obtain blood cultures and urgent CT, and involve haematology or transplant, infection or microbiology, respiratory medicine and antifungal pharmacy.
  2. Send serum biomarkers and pursue BAL or tissue only if the expected diagnostic benefit justifies procedural risk; capture details of prophylaxis and prior antifungal exposure.
  3. Start prompt mould-active treatment matched to the most likely species and local pathway rather than waiting for culture in an unstable high-probability case.
  4. Reassess diagnosis, spectrum, drug exposure, interactions and source control within 24 to 72 hours as imaging and mycology evolve.

Key medicines

VoriconazoleFor serious invasive aspergillosis, the SmPC describes loading followed by maintenance, commonly intravenous 6 mg/kg every 12 hours for 24 hours then 4 mg/kg every 12 hours, with an oral adult maintenance option; specialists must adjust using exposure, weight, liver function and interactions.No Mucorales activity. Major CYP interactions, hepatotoxicity, visual or neurological effects, photosensitivity and QT prolongation; use therapeutic drug monitoring and verify the current SmPC, BNF and local protocol.
Liposomal amphotericin BIntravenous weight-based specialist regimen; 3 mg/kg daily is used for many systemic fungal infections, while suspected mucormycosis may require a different higher specialist dose. Confirm current SmPC and local mycology advice.Infusion reactions, nephrotoxicity, potassium and magnesium loss, anaemia and additive toxicity with other nephrotoxins. Formulations are not dose-interchangeable.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • RCPath UK SMI S12: Sepsis and systemic or disseminated infectionsCurrent UK investigation framework for invasive fungal and disseminated infection.
  • RCPath UK SMI B57: BAL and lower respiratory specimensBAL fungal culture and galactomannan specimen guidance.
  • Voriconazole Summary of Product CharacteristicsAuthoritative UK licensed regimen, interactions and safety information.
  • Liposomal amphotericin B Summary of Product CharacteristicsAuthoritative formulation-specific dosing and toxicity information.
  • BNF: Antifungal drugsCurrent UK prescribing context; specialist and local protocols remain essential.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom