Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Partner notification and contact tracing

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Partner work must not delay expiring care

A partner exposure may reveal an HIV PEP window, emergency-contraception need, severe infection, pregnancy complication, sexual assault or immediate violence risk that cannot wait for routine notification.

Action: Assess the exposed person’s urgent clinical and safety needs immediately, use provider or emergency pathways when direct contact is unsafe, and complete organism-specific notification once time-critical care is secured.

Synopsis

Plan confidential, organism-specific partner notification that protects the index patient, reaches exposed contacts for testing and treatment, accounts for violence or safeguarding risk, and verifies outcomes.

  • Partner notification identifies people exposed during the pathogen- and presentation-specific lookback, supports testing or treatment, and protects the index patient’s identity.
  • Define partners by actual exposure and timing rather than relationship labels; different infections and stages use different lookback periods.
  • Offer patient referral, provider referral or a negotiated conditional approach, choosing with the patient according to safety and likely completion.

Key red flags

Notification could provoke violence, stalking, eviction, coercion, honour-based abuse or digital surveillance; direct patient referral may be unsafe.

A contact may be pregnant, symptomatic, within an HIV PEP window or exposed to resistant gonorrhoea and needs rapid clinical access.

The index patient or contact is a child, lacks decision-making capacity or may be exploited, requiring safeguarding alongside confidential care.

Persistent gonorrhoea symptoms or a correctly timed positive follow-up test without re-exposure requires culture, susceptibility and specialist escalation.

A clinician is considering identifiable disclosure without consent; obtain senior, information-governance or legal advice unless delay creates serious harm.

Unsafe direct contact

Violence, coercion, stalking, shared devices or fear of retaliation favours provider-led notification and a wider safety plan.

Time-critical partner need

Recent HIV exposure, pregnancy risk, symptoms or resistant gonorrhoea can require same-day clinical access rather than routine messaging.

Investigation priorities

01
Partner and exposure mapFirst step

Identify contactable partners, anatomical sites and timing within the applicable lookback.

Management branches

Notification planChoose a safe referral route

An index patient has a confirmed STI and two partners may have been exposed.

  1. Explain the purpose and confidentiality of notification, then apply the current organism-specific lookback and clarify exposure sites.
  2. Ask about violence, coercion, privacy and safe communication before choosing patient, provider or conditional referral.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 13 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 13 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom