Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Sexual assault: immediate clinical care

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Stabilisation and safety come first

Major bleeding, strangulation, loss of consciousness, chest or abdominal injury, severe pain, intoxication, poisoning, suicidal intent, ongoing perpetrator access or a child at immediate risk requires emergency and safeguarding action.

Action: Use ABCDE and the relevant trauma, toxicology, mental-health or safeguarding pathway; involve a SARC or paediatric sexual-assault service early without delaying life-saving treatment.

Synopsis

Deliver trauma-informed immediate care after sexual assault, treat injury and time-sensitive pregnancy or infection risk, preserve choice about forensic examination and reporting, and arrange safe follow-up.

  • Believe the disclosure, thank the person for telling you, ask what they need now and avoid questions whose only purpose is investigating the allegation.
  • Obtain explicit consent separately for history, examination, treatment, photographs, forensic samples, information sharing and police involvement; consent may be withdrawn.
  • Treat life-threatening injury first, then address strangulation, head injury, genital or anal trauma, intoxication, pregnancy risk, HIV exposure and hepatitis B protection.

Key red flags

Strangulation can cause delayed airway, vascular and neurological complications even when external marks are absent.

Possible drug-facilitated assault creates short toxicology windows; obtain specialist forensic advice promptly while treating intoxication or overdose.

Pregnancy risk needs emergency-contraception assessment within method-specific time limits and must not wait for police contact.

A qualifying HIV exposure needs PEP assessment as soon as possible and no later than 72 hours under current UK guidance.

Children and young people require age-appropriate specialist examination, capacity or consent assessment and nation-specific safeguarding action.

The alleged perpetrator accompanying the patient, monitoring a phone or controlling transport may indicate immediate danger and an unsafe discharge plan.

Strangulation risk

Voice change, dysphagia, dyspnoea, neck pain, neurological symptoms or loss of consciousness after neck compression requires urgent assessment.

Drug-facilitated concern

Unexpected amnesia, disproportionate intoxication or suspected covert administration needs prompt clinical care and specialist toxicology advice.

HIV exposure window

A potentially qualifying exposure should be assessed for PEP immediately because initiation is not recommended beyond 72 hours.

Unsafe return

Perpetrator access, stalking, controlled communications or dependent children can make ordinary discharge arrangements dangerous.

Reasoning priorities

01
Immediate trauma and strangulation assessment

Identify airway, vascular, neurological, thoracoabdominal and genital injuries needing emergency treatment.

Normal external appearance does not exclude internal injury; symptoms and mechanism determine observation, imaging and referral.

Worked reasoning

Worked caseRestore choice in the first consultation

An adult presents hours after an assault, has no major bleeding and is unsure about police involvement.

  1. Check immediate safety, ABCDE, strangulation, head and abdominal injury, intoxication, suicidality and whether anyone accompanying them is safe.
  2. Explain medical, SARC, forensic and reporting options separately and obtain consent for each chosen part without pressing for a decision.
  3. Address emergency contraception, HIV PEP within the current window, hepatitis B and site-specific testing while contacting the SARC for forensic advice.
  4. Agree safe transport and contact methods, result ownership, repeat pregnancy and infection testing, PEP follow-up and advocacy support.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 13 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 13 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom