Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Alarm symptoms and urgent upper-GI endoscopy

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Complete obstruction or major bleeding

Inability to swallow saliva, airway compromise, haematemesis with shock or perforation physiology needs emergency hospital care rather than an outpatient suspected-cancer referral.

Action: Use ABCDE resuscitation, keep the patient nil by mouth when obstructed, obtain urgent endoscopy or surgical help, and arrange haemorrhage or perforation management before routine pathway administration.

Synopsis

Recognise oesophago-gastric cancer alarm presentations, choose the correct urgent referral route, preserve airway and nutrition during obstruction, and close the loop on endoscopy and histology.

  • Refer on the NICE NG12 suspected oesophago-gastric cancer pathway for dysphagia at any adult age, or age 55 or over with weight loss plus upper-abdominal pain, reflux or dyspepsia. Also consider this pathway for an upper-abdominal mass consistent with gastric cancer.
  • Normal haemoglobin does not neutralise progressive dysphagia. NG12 has a separate non-urgent direct-access endoscopy branch: haematemesis after appropriate acute-bleeding assessment, and specified combinations from age 55 involving resistant dyspepsia, low haemoglobin, raised platelets, nausea or vomiting. The full combinations are listed under investigations.
  • Ask about speed of progression, solids and liquids, pain, regurgitation, bleeding, appetite, weight trajectory, smoking, alcohol, reflux and previous gastric surgery.

Key red flags

Dysphagia itself triggers suspected oesophageal or gastric cancer referral under NICE, irrespective of age or an existing reflux diagnosis.

Haematemesis, melaena, progressive vomiting, iron-deficiency anaemia and unintended weight loss increase urgency and require physiological as well as diagnostic assessment.

Progressive dysphagia

Solids-first progression with weight loss is a common obstructive cancer pattern, although liquid difficulty may appear when narrowing becomes advanced.

Complete bolus arrest

Drooling and inability to swallow saliva indicate emergency obstruction regardless of the underlying histology.

Reasoning priorities

01
Suspected-cancer referral and urgent upper-GI endoscopy

Apply NG12 eligibility and inspect and biopsy the oesophagus and stomach.

Dysphagia is sufficient at any adult age; age 55 or over with weight loss plus upper-abdominal pain, reflux or dyspepsia is a separate referral trigger. Also consider suspected-cancer referral for an upper-abdominal mass consistent with gastric cancer. These outpatient criteria do not replace emergency assessment for secretion intolerance, unstable bleeding or perforation.

Worked reasoning

Worked case: progressive dysphagiaComplete the urgent pathway

A 70-year-old has six weeks of solids-first dysphagia, an 8 kg measured weight loss and reduced oral intake, but can still swallow fluids and has stable observations.

  1. Refer immediately on the suspected oesophago-gastric cancer pathway, document the continuing ability to drink and arrange dietetic support rather than delaying for an acid-suppression trial.
  2. Upper-GI endoscopy five days later identifies a tight ulcerated distal oesophageal lesion from 35 to 40 cm; the endoscopist records that it is not safely traversable and obtains eight viable biopsies from non-necrotic edges without dilating the malignant narrowing.
  3. Histology confirms adenocarcinoma and staging CT shows no distant metastasis, so the referral is transferred directly to the specialist oesophago-gastric MDT for radical assessment.
  4. Verify that the patient has received the result, is maintaining hydration on a modified liquid diet and has a named MDT appointment; repeat weight at review shows no further loss while staging is completed.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status5 sources · checked 8 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 8 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom