Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Endoscopic biopsy and staging principles

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Bleeding, perforation or near-complete obstruction

Biopsy and endoscopic passage can precipitate bleeding, aspiration or perforation when a lesion is friable, deeply ulcerated or almost occlusive.

Action: Stop the examination when safe passage is uncertain, resuscitate any complication, obtain surgical and radiological help, and plan repeat tissue acquisition without forcing the instrument through a dangerous narrowing.

Synopsis

Obtain diagnostic tissue safely, describe upper-GI tumours reproducibly, separate diagnosis from stage, and preserve later endoscopic, surgical and molecular treatment options.

  • Describe tumour site relative to incisors, gastro-oesophageal junction, cardia, pylorus and other fixed landmarks because classification changes staging and operation.
  • Record length, circumference, morphology, ulceration, bleeding, obstruction and whether the scope passes without force.
  • Match sample burden to the lesion: at least eight viable biopsies for advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer, only one or two targeted biopsies for potentially endoscopically resectable neoplasia, and at least ten bite-on-bite samples for suspected gastric linitis.

Key red flags

A negative superficial biopsy does not exclude infiltrative gastric linitis or a submucosal oesophageal process when imaging and endoscopic stiffness remain concerning.

A tight lesion that cannot be traversed should be documented and staged by other modalities rather than dilated solely to complete a diagnostic examination.

Near-occlusive lumen

Inability to pass safely changes nutrition and staging technique; forceful traversal risks perforation.

Reasoning priorities

01
High-definition endoscopy

Map the lesion and identify the safest viable biopsy targets.

Report fixed landmarks, dimensions, circumference, morphology and traversability with representative images.

Worked reasoning

Worked case: obstructing lesionObtain decisive tissue without forcing passage

A 68-year-old with progressive dysphagia has a friable distal oesophageal lesion whose lumen will not admit the standard gastroscope without resistance.

  1. Record the visible tumour from 34 to 39 cm, its circumferential narrowing and non-traversability, and decide against diagnostic dilation because staging can continue without forcing the scope.
  2. Obtain eight viable biopsies from different non-necrotic edges in one correctly labelled jar; pathology reports poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with enough tumour for HER2 and other indicated biomarker testing.
  3. Staging CT identifies two liver lesions, and an image-guided liver biopsy confirms metastatic adenocarcinoma, making detailed local EUS staging unnecessary.
  4. Verify that pathology, HER2 testing, CT and nutritional assessment reach the MDT together; the documented outcome is a systemic-treatment consultation plus rapid dysphagia palliation rather than oesophagectomy.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 8 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 8 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom