Doctor’s Passport

Find your next topic

Explore the current textbook

Available drafts · Clinical review pending
Membership
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.
Rapid

Angioplasty, stenting and bypass principles

Essential points for quick revision.

Saved on this device
!
Recognise failed or complicated revascularisation

New severe pain, pallor, coolness, pulse loss, sensory change or weakness after intervention suggests acute thrombosis, embolisation, dissection or compartment syndrome; haemodynamic instability, expanding groin swelling or falling haemoglobin suggests bleeding.

Action: Obtain immediate vascular and anaesthetic review, use ABCDE and haemorrhage support where needed, document limb neurology and Doppler signals, and do not delay return to angiography or theatre for routine ward investigations.

Synopsis

Choose endovascular or open lower-limb revascularisation from clinical indication, patient risk, anatomy, conduit, durability and informed goals.

  • Treat the patient’s syndrome and goals, not a percentage stenosis or an attractive technical image.
  • Stable claudication usually needs risk reduction and supervised exercise before invasive treatment is justified.
  • NICE offers angioplasty for claudication only after non-invasive treatment is unsatisfactory and imaging confirms suitability.

Key red flags

Acutely painful, cold, pale or neurologically impaired limb before or after treatment needs immediate vascular assessment.

Expanding access-site swelling, hypotension, flank or abdominal pain after catheter intervention may indicate major or retroperitoneal bleeding.

Disproportionate limb pain, pain on passive movement, tense compartments or neurological loss suggests compartment syndrome.

Fever, graft exposure, groin wound breakdown or sepsis after bypass raises concern for graft infection and requires urgent specialist care.

Limb-salvage candidate

Objective ischaemia accompanies rest pain or tissue loss, the limb remains reconstructible, and meaningful healing or function is achievable.

Early technical failure

New pain, pulse loss, sensory change, weakness or wound deterioration after treatment suggests thrombosis, embolisation or inadequate perfusion.

Investigation priorities

01
Clinical and physiological confirmationFirst step

Confirm that PAD explains symptoms or tissue threat before selecting anatomy-driven treatment.

Management branches

Management selectionChoose a revascularisation strategy

PAD causes disabling claudication or limb threat and a procedure may improve a meaningful outcome.

  1. Confirm the clinical indication, objective ischaemia, patient goal and response to appropriate non-invasive treatment before reviewing the angiogram.
  2. Assess physiological reserve, life expectancy, wound and infection severity, lesion distribution, distal target, conduit and centre capability.
Open full textbook Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status3 sources · checked 12 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 12 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom