Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

Respite, palliative care and advance planning

Paediatrics and child health · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Acute deterioration with an advance plan

A child with a life-limiting condition may still have a reversible emergency. An advance care plan informs goals and treatment limits but never replaces immediate assessment of distress, airway, breathing, circulation, seizures and pain.

Action: Provide ABCDE care and rapid symptom relief, retrieve and verify the current plan, contact the named paediatric or palliative team, clarify the family's understanding and deliver agreed treatments without assuming that a resuscitation limitation means no active care.

Synopsis

Integrate paediatric palliative care and short breaks from diagnosis, assess multidimensional symptoms, support family life, record proportionate emergency and end-of-life decisions and provide coordinated care wherever the child is treated.

  • Paediatric palliative care begins when a life-limiting or life-threatening condition creates need and can run alongside disease-directed treatment.
  • Assess physical symptoms, communication, development, emotional wellbeing, family capacity, culture, spirituality, education and practical care together.
  • Offer short breaks according to assessed family need and child safety; respite can occur at home, in hospice or another suitable setting.
  • Create an advance care plan through repeated conversations, including goals, preferred place, emergency treatments, escalation limits and key contacts.
  • A do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation decision concerns CPR only and must not be interpreted as withholding antibiotics, oxygen, fluids or comfort care automatically.
  • Reassess potentially reversible causes of deterioration while delivering prompt relief from pain, breathlessness, secretions, nausea, agitation and seizures.
  • Prepare anticipatory medicines and equipment through the responsible clinical team with exact child-specific instructions, access and governance.
  • Continue bereavement support, sibling care, practical guidance and team debrief after death rather than ending contact abruptly.

Key red flags

Uncontrolled pain, breathlessness, agitation, haemorrhage or repeated prolonged seizures requires urgent specialist symptom-management support.

A family unable to continue safe care because of exhaustion, equipment failure or loss of night support needs an immediate contingency response.

Conflict about treatment goals, uncertainty over plan validity or disagreement between those with parental responsibility should prompt senior clinical and legal-ethical support.

New injury, unexplained medicine discrepancy, fear or neglect remains a safeguarding concern despite life-limiting illness.

A plan that cannot be found, is out of date or lacks clear emergency actions is unsafe and must be reviewed rather than interpreted informally.

Sibling distress, parental mental-health crisis or complicated grief risk deserves active assessment and support.

Investigation priorities

01
Individualised symptom assessmentFirst step

Define intensity, likely mechanism, triggers, communication and effect on function.

Management branches

Early palliative involvementAdd quality-of-life expertise alongside treatment

A life-limiting condition causes symptoms, complex decisions or substantial family burden.

  1. Ask the child and family what matters now and what they fear.
  2. Assess symptoms, development, family capacity and practical service gaps.
  3. Coordinate disease-directed, community, hospice and primary-care contributions.
  4. Agree regular review and a route for urgent advice.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • NICE NG61 End of life care for infants children and young peoplePlanning, symptoms, care in different settings, dying and bereavement.
  • GMC Treatment and care towards the end of lifeDecision-making, benefit and burden, CPR and communication duties.
  • RCPCH Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting conditionsPaediatric ethical framework for treatment limitation and conflict.
  • NHS England service specification for children's palliative careSpecialist service coordination and access context.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom