Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
QuestionsFlashcardsBriefsDashboardAccount
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

← Psychiatry indexChapter sections
Purpose and principlesIndications, selection and cautionsMethod and interpretationClinical next stepsProcedure and medicine safetyRisks, monitoring and follow-upSpecial situationsCommon pitfallsQuestionsSources
Full textbook10 sectionsOpen only what you need
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.

Psychiatric assessment after overdose

Psychiatry · UK scope · Sources checked 7 Sept 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Poisoning and suicidal crisis can coexist

A patient may look well despite a potentially serious ingestion, and apparent regret does not establish that further self-harm risk has resolved.

Action: Assess ABCDE, glucose, ingestion details and immediate safety, obtain poison-specific advice and treatment, and request mental-health assessment while medical care proceeds.

Purpose and principles

Combine toxicological care with an early psychosocial assessment, formulate ongoing safety needs and arrange a specific shared plan after intentional self-poisoning.

The aim after an overdose is to understand what happened, treat its physical consequences and reduce the likelihood of further harm. The number of tablets and the patient's stated wish to die are important but incomplete. A person may underestimate toxicity, conceal a co-ingestion, feel ambivalent about living or describe different intentions as distress changes. Ask with curiosity and directness, avoiding a moral judgement about whether the event was serious enough to deserve assessment.

The toxicological and psychosocial tracks should run together. Establish substance, formulation, estimated amount, timing, alcohol or other co-ingestion and treatment already given. Check original packets, prescriptions and collateral information where appropriate. Use the specific TOXBASE entry and NPIS advice for uncertain or complex poisoning. A general observation period or generic blood panel cannot establish safety for every substance; antidote, ECG, blood concentration and repeat-test requirements depend on the exposure.

A mental-health professional should undertake psychosocial assessment as early as the person can engage. Mild intoxication does not necessarily prevent a meaningful conversation, and a fixed alcohol threshold should not determine access. If drowsiness, severe intoxication or distress makes assessment unreliable, provide immediate care and review readiness regularly. Initial conversations, collateral evidence and supportive contact remain useful even when the full assessment must be completed later.

Indications, selection and cautions

Continuing wish to die

Current intent, preparations, inability to identify a workable short-term safety plan or reluctance to disclose access to means requires careful escalation.

Ambivalence and changing account

A patient's description can change as fear, shame, intoxication or distress changes; explore discrepancies respectfully without assuming deception.

Hidden safeguarding problem

Coercion, violence, exploitation or inability to return safely home may become apparent only during private discussion away from accompanying people.

Unmet physical vulnerability

Chronic pain, disabling illness, pregnancy, dependence on others or limited access to care may shape both the episode and the support required afterwards.

Red flags requiring action

  • An uncertain ingestion time, sustained-release preparation, mixed overdose, impaired consciousness, seizure or ECG abnormality requires a toxicological plan before discharge is considered.
  • Persistent intent, preparations for another attempt, access to lethal means, severe agitation, psychosis or an unsafe home environment needs prompt senior mental-health review and protection.

Method and interpretation

  1. 01
    Poison-specific medical assessmentFirst step
    Why
    Determine the exposure's likely effects and the required treatment or observation timeline.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Use substance-specific advice for ECGs, blood concentrations, organ-function testing and antidotes; an initially well patient may still develop delayed toxicity.
  2. 02
    Psychosocial interview
    Why
    Understand the act in context and identify the person's immediate and longer-term needs.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Build an individual formulation rather than deriving discharge from a score; include strengths, current stressors, preferences and access to support.
  3. 03
    Capacity and ability to engage
    Why
    Determine whether the person can make the particular treatment or discharge decision now.
    Interpretation and limitations
    For the England and Wales MCA framework, document an impairment or disturbance causing inability to understand, retain, use or weigh relevant information, or communicate the decision despite practical support. Intoxication or diagnosis alone is insufficient; Scotland and Northern Ireland use their own legislation.
  4. 04
    Collateral information and records
    Why
    Clarify previous episodes, treatment, exposure details and current social circumstances.
    Interpretation and limitations

Clinical next steps

01Arrival and stabilisationProvide physical and emotional care togetherFirst stepThe patient presents following deliberate ingestion or a concerning overdose of uncertain intent.+
  1. 1Treat physiological compromise, establish the exposure timeline and institute the specific toxicology monitoring and treatment plan.
  2. 2Offer a private supportive space and early liaison assessment, explaining the process and reducing unnecessary barriers caused by stigma or distress.
  3. 3Review observation needs, access to further medicines and safeguarding while preserving dignity and involving a chosen supporter appropriately.
02Psychosocial formulationUnderstand what may happen nextThe person can participate sufficiently to discuss the episode and current circumstances.+
  1. 1Explore the sequence and meaning of the overdose, current suicidal thinking, prior episodes, mental state, substance use and relevant physical illness.

Procedure and medicine safety

Treat the physiological consequences of the particular ingestion while psychological assessment and safety planning continue.

Antidotes and acute poisoning treatment

Select the antidote, loading dose, route, infusion schedule, repeat investigations and stopping criteria from the identified poison's TOXBASE pathway, using NPIS advice for mixed, delayed, staggered or uncertain exposure. Do not apply one antidote schedule to all overdoses.

Dose and timing depend on substance, formulation, body weight, ingestion pattern and organ function; the relevant entry must be available at prescribing. No generic antidote reverses intentional self-poisoning as a category.

Risks, monitoring and follow-up

  • Reassess suicidal thoughts, distress and engagement after changes in intoxication, physical symptoms, new information or proposed discharge arrangements.
  • Continue medical observations and timed tests until the poison-specific criteria are satisfied; psychiatric assessment does not provide toxicological clearance.
  • Check the patient understands the safety plan and has a practical way to reach contacts, obtain transport and access the intended place of care.
  • Review prescribing quantities, duplicate supplies, storage and potentially toxic combinations collaboratively, avoiding abrupt discontinuation of essential treatment without a plan.
  • Confirm receipt of handover and the aftercare appointment or contact; unresolved safeguarding or accommodation needs require active coordination.

Special situations

Intent and lethality differ

A person can intend to die after a medically limited ingestion or survive a highly toxic exposure they believed harmless, so both dimensions require assessment.

Risk categories lose detail

A single label can hide changing circumstances and actionable needs; a formulation explains the current concerns and why particular support is being arranged.

Parallel assessment reduces delay

Supportive mental-health contact during medical treatment can improve engagement and prevent the patient waiting unsupported for a sequence of artificial clearances.

Safety plans need usable steps

A telephone number is not an effective plan if the person lacks a charged phone, privacy, language support or confidence that the service will respond.

Common pitfalls

  1. 01

    Declining psychosocial assessment because the patient is intoxicated without assessing their actual ability to engage or arranging regular review.

  2. 02

    Using a low score, apparent remorse or an agreement not to self-harm as the deciding reason for discharge.

  3. 03

    Waiting for all physical treatment to finish before offering any mental-health support when parallel assessment is feasible.

  4. 04

    Assuming the accompanying partner is safe to involve without providing a private opportunity to disclose abuse or coercion.

  5. 05

    Providing vague follow-up instructions without a named service, timing or solution to barriers that could prevent attendance.

Practice

Two practice questions

Your practice draft is saved in this browser.

Question 1 of 2
0 correct
PsychiatryOriginal SBA

Assessment during intoxication

A patient who has intentionally taken tablets has consumed alcohol but remains able to follow a conversation and explain the events clearly. Physical treatment is underway. How should the mental-health assessment proceed?

Choose one answer, then submit
← Rapid synopsisBack to overviewAll Psychiatry topics →
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 7 Sept 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Typical adult dose examples remain subject to patient factors, contraindications and the live BNF or specialist protocol. Source check completed 7 Sept 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • NICE NG225 self-harm recommendationsEarly psychosocial assessment, risk formulation, discharge and initial aftercare.
  • NPIS TOXBASE clinical toxicology informationUK poison-specific decision support; individual clinical entries require registered access.
  • NHS SPS poisoning and toxicity resourcesCurrent NHS guidance on selecting TOXBASE and NPIS advice.
  • Mental Capacity Act Code of PracticeEngland and Wales decision-specific capacity and emergency care principles.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom

Explore the sequence before, during and after the overdose. Ask about stressors, planning, expectations of death, measures to avoid or obtain discovery, help-seeking, current regret and continuing thoughts. Include previous self-harm, mental illness, trauma, substance use, physical pain, domestic abuse, housing, debt, work and dependants. Protective relationships and future plans matter, but they do not cancel active intent. Formulate how the factors interact in this person's current situation.

Discharge requires a coherent clinical and practical plan. Confirm that the poisoning-specific observation and treatment requirements are satisfied and that psychosocial assessment and aftercare planning have taken place. The patient should know who will contact them, when, and what to do if the situation worsens. Provide written information in an accessible form, involve carers appropriately and communicate with relevant services. A promise not to self-harm is not a substitute for this work.

Key points

  • Self-harm includes intentional self-poisoning irrespective of the stated purpose or apparent lethality.
  • Begin psychosocial assessment at the earliest opportunity alongside physical treatment, rather than waiting for every medical investigation to finish.
  • Intoxication is not an automatic exclusion; assess the person's ability to engage and review repeatedly if they cannot yet participate.
  • Explore the circumstances, meaning and function of the overdose, current thoughts, previous episodes, strengths and practical support.
  • Do not use numerical risk scales or low, medium and high categories to predict suicide or determine discharge.
  • Create a collaborative safety plan with warning signs, coping actions, supportive contacts, emergency access and safer access to medicines.
  • With ongoing safety concerns, NICE recommends initial aftercare within forty-eight hours of the psychosocial assessment.
Seek consent where possible, explain confidentiality limits and use proportionate information-sharing when necessary to prevent serious harm; document disagreements and uncertainty.
2
Identify practical pressures, relationships, dependants, strengths and realistic support; agree which problems need immediate action before leaving hospital.
  • 3Write a narrative safety formulation with the patient and colleagues, stating uncertainties and explaining why the proposed level of care fits present needs.
  • 03Transition from hospitalMake aftercare specific and accessiblePhysical treatment requirements and psychosocial assessment are complete and a disposition is being planned.+
    1. 1Arrange a management and safety plan, involving relevant agencies and an appropriate discharge-planning discussion before the patient leaves.
    2. 2Agree safer access to medicines and other means, specific coping steps, crisis contacts and what the patient or supporters should do if intent returns.
    3. 3Provide initial aftercare within forty-eight hours of assessment when safety concerns persist, and document the responsible service and confirmed contact arrangements.