Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…
← Rheumatology indexChapter sections
Purpose and principlesIndications, selection and cautionsMethod and interpretationClinical next stepsRisks, monitoring and follow-upSpecial situationsCommon pitfallsQuestionsSources
Full textbook9 sectionsOpen only what you need
Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewThe full textbook explains uncertainty but does not replace live national or local guidance, specialist advice, or current prescribing information.

The rheumatological history and examination

Rheumatology · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Time-critical presentation

Stop the routine sequence for a septic-appearing hot joint, acute neurovascular compromise, compartment syndrome, threatened vision, new focal neurological deficit, severe spinal red flags or systemic vasculitic organ dysfunction and activate the appropriate emergency pathway.

Purpose and principles

Take a reproducible rheumatological history and perform a respectful screening and regional examination that defines anatomy, inflammation, systemic involvement, function and urgency before selecting investigations.

A rheumatological consultation constructs a phenotype across six dimensions: anatomical site, inflammatory versus non-inflammatory behaviour, distribution, time course, systemic associations and functional impact. Ask the patient to point with one finger to the worst site and distinguish pain, stiffness, weakness, numbness and instability. Explore previous episodes, trauma, infection, psoriasis, bowel or eye disease, Raynaud phenomenon, sicca symptoms, ulcers, rash, thrombotic or obstetric history and family disease.

Medicine history must include corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, anticoagulants, diuretics, statins, antimicrobials, supplements and previous toxicity. Ask about infection exposure, vaccination, pregnancy plans, smoking, alcohol, occupation and recreational load because they alter both diagnosis and treatment safety. For established inflammatory disease, document current regimen, adherence, monitoring, flares, steroid burden and prior treatment failures.

Examination starts globally: physiology, gait, posture, transfers and general appearance. A structured screen identifies abnormalities, followed by regional inspection, palpation, movement and function. Examine the joint above and below, neurovascular status and spine when relevant. Special tests should answer a defined anatomical question and are interpreted as a cluster rather than isolated proof.

Conclude aloud or in notes with a syndrome statement and important negatives, for example: 'symmetrical small-joint synovitis with psoriasis and nail pitting, no current uveitis or systemic illness'. State limitations caused by pain, dressings or inability to position. This summary should directly justify referral, aspiration, imaging or targeted serology.

Key points

  • Begin with onset, tempo, pain site, swelling, stiffness, night symptoms, triggers, function and systemic features; the patient's trajectory is often more discriminating than pain severity.
  • Use a GALS-style screen—gait, arms, legs and spine—to identify regions requiring a detailed examination, but do not let a screen replace targeted assessment of the presenting problem.
  • Look before touching: posture, aids, muscle bulk, scars, rash, psoriasis, nail disease, swelling and how the patient transfers provide high-value information.
  • Compare active, passive and resisted movement to distinguish articular restriction, contractile tissue pain and effort limited by pain or fear.
  • Describe swelling as soft synovitis, effusion, bony enlargement, oedema or a focal mass rather than using the word 'swollen' without anatomy.
  • Examine skin, nails, eyes, mouth, lymph nodes and relevant organ systems when inflammatory or connective-tissue disease is possible.
  • Record function using concrete tasks—walking distance, stairs, dressing, grip, work and sleep—not only a numerical pain score.
  • Consent, privacy, chaperone, communication support and pain-limited adaptation are part of examination accuracy and safety.

Indications, selection and cautions

Objective synovitis

Soft or fluctuant joint-line swelling with warmth, tenderness and restricted movement supports active synovial inflammation and should be mapped by joint and duration.

Enthesitis and dactylitis

Focal tenderness at tendon or ligament insertion and uniform whole-digit swelling support a spondyloarthritis phenotype when interpreted with skin, nail, bowel and eye history.

Proximal weakness

Difficulty rising or lifting arms with objectively reduced proximal power, rather than pain alone, suggests muscle or neurological disease and requires CK, medicine and systemic assessment.

Neurovascular threatRed flag

Disproportionate pain, tense swelling, pallor, pulse change, progressive weakness or sensory loss requires immediate trauma, vascular or surgical escalation rather than completion of routine tests.

Organ-threatening systemic diseaseRed flag

Purpura with neuropathy, haematuria or proteinuria, hypoxia, severe cytopenia, myocarditis or new neurological dysfunction may indicate organ-threatening immune disease and requires urgent specialty assessment.

Method and interpretation

  1. 01
    GALS musculoskeletal screenFirst step
    Why
    Identify gait, upper-limb, lower-limb and spinal abnormalities requiring regional examination.
    Interpretation and limitations
    A normal screen reduces the likelihood of major functional abnormality but does not exclude early synovitis, enthesitis or disease outside the manoeuvres tested.
  2. 02
    Regional look–feel–move examination
    Why
    Localise pathology to joint, bone, tendon, bursa, muscle, nerve or referred anatomy.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Compare sides and active with passive range, document pain-limited testing and repeat surprising findings. Special tests modify probability rather than act as stand-alone diagnoses.
  3. 03
    Functional observation
    Why
    Measure real-world consequences and expose patterns not apparent on couch examination.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Observe gait, sit-to-stand, grip, reach and dressing-relevant movement safely. Adapt for aids and baseline disability and document assistance rather than labelling a task simply failed.
  4. 04
    System-specific examination
    Why
    Find extra-articular manifestations that define disease and urgency.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Skin and nail examination may reveal psoriasis or vasculitis; a painful red, photophobic eye or visual change requires urgent ophthalmic assessment; cardiorespiratory, abdominal, neurological and urine findings guide targeted escalation.

Clinical next steps

01First encounterScreen, localise and define the phenotypeFirst stepA new musculoskeletal complaint without current physiological instability.+
  1. 1Take a timed history covering inflammation, distribution, systemic associations, function, medicines and red flags before selecting the depth of examination.
  2. 2Perform general inspection and a GALS-style screen, then examine abnormal and symptom-relevant regions with comparison, active, passive and resisted movement.
  3. 3Summarise anatomy, inflammatory probability, systemic features and uncertainty; order only investigations that answer the resulting clinical questions.
02Acute red flagAbandon ceremony and protect tissueExamination finds a hot joint, neurovascular compromise, severe spinal red flags, systemic illness or threatened eye or organ function.+
  1. 1Record essential observations and focused baseline findings, provide immediate analgesia or resuscitation, and call the appropriate acute team.

Risks, monitoring and follow-up

  • Repeat the same joint and functional measures at review to distinguish true change from technique variation.
  • Document swollen and tender joints separately, including joints not assessable because of dressings, pain or deformity.
  • Track extra-articular symptoms and organ examination in systemic disease rather than focusing exclusively on joint pain.
  • Review corticosteroid dose, infection symptoms and laboratory-monitoring adherence at every relevant established-disease visit.
  • Communicate a precise baseline and escalation triggers when handing over an acute or evolving presentation.

Special situations

The patient demonstrates function

How a coat is removed, a chair is used or a hand supports transfer may reveal shoulder restriction, grip weakness or lower-limb pain before formal testing.

Tenderness is not swelling

Widespread tenderness may reflect pain amplification, but this does not exclude focal synovitis; record the two findings independently.

Passive range tests the joint

Pain and restriction through passive movement support articular or capsular pathology, while preserved passive motion redirects attention to contractile or superficial structures.

A screen is purposefully incomplete

GALS helps find regional abnormalities but does not fully examine every joint, tendon, enthesis, nerve or systemic manifestation.

Language shapes decisions

Terms such as boggy synovitis, bony enlargement, pitting oedema and whole-digit dactylitis communicate anatomy more safely than 'joint swollen'.

Common pitfalls

  1. 01

    Performing provocative special tests despite severe acute pain or suspected fracture.

  2. 02

    Calling reduced movement weakness without distinguishing pain inhibition from loss of power.

  3. 03

    Omitting skin, nails and eyes in a possible spondyloarthritis presentation.

  4. 04

    Recording a normal musculoskeletal examination after completing only a brief screen.

  5. 05

    Failing to state examination limitations, chaperone use or the reason a manoeuvre was unsafe.

Practice

Two practice questions

Your practice draft is saved in this browser.

Question 1 of 2
0 correct
RheumatologyOriginal SBA

Localising shoulder pain

A patient has pain and weakness during active shoulder abduction, pain on resisted abduction, but nearly full passive movement when relaxed. What is the most useful anatomical interpretation?

Choose one answer, then submit
← Rapid synopsisBack to overviewAll Rheumatology topics →
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • NICE NG100 rheumatoid arthritisClinical synovitis and referral principles.
  • NICE NG65 spondyloarthritisExamination features and extra-articular associations.
  • NICE NG226 osteoarthritisClinical assessment of common mechanical joint disease.
  • British Society for Rheumatology guidelinesSpecialist examination and disease-management standards.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateComplete draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom
  • 05
    Patient-reported and disease activity measures
    Why
    Add reproducible symptom and function data once a diagnosis and purpose are clear.
    Interpretation and limitations
    Scores support longitudinal care but can be influenced by damage, fibromyalgia and comorbidity; never substitute a total score for joint and organ examination.
  • 2DefinitiveArrange aspiration, cultures, urgent imaging or organ-specific tests without delaying definitive treatment for a complete outpatient-style examination.
  • 3Time-stamp and repeat the focused examination after intervention so deterioration and response are visible across handover.
    • 03Established rheumatic diseaseSeparate activity, damage and treatment harmA patient with a known diagnosis reports worsening pain, stiffness, function or systemic symptoms.+
    1. 1Map active inflammation and extra-articular disease while identifying fixed damage, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, infection and medicine toxicity as competing causes.
    2. 2Review adherence, steroid exposure, DMARD monitoring, infection and vaccination status and patient goals before attributing symptoms to treatment failure.
    3. 3EscalationUse agreed disease measures and objective tests to support escalation, rehabilitation or comorbidity care, then document a clear review and safety plan.