Skip to textbook content
Doctor’s PassportTextbook
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Textbook navigation
TopicsAll topics

Loading topic navigation…

Educational draft · awaiting clinical reviewUse Rapid for revision, not patient-care decisions. Check current national and local guidance and the BNF or BNFC before acting.

The rheumatological history and examination

Rheumatology · UK scope · Sources checked 27 Aug 2026 · Clinical review pending

RapidFull
!
Escalate

Stop the routine sequence for a septic-appearing hot joint, acute neurovascular compromise, compartment syndrome, threatened vision, new focal neurological deficit, severe spinal red flags or systemic vasculitic organ dysfunction and activate the appropriate emergency pathway.

Synopsis

Take a reproducible rheumatological history and perform a respectful screening and regional examination that defines anatomy, inflammation, systemic involvement, function and urgency before selecting investigations.

  • Begin with onset, tempo, pain site, swelling, stiffness, night symptoms, triggers, function and systemic features; the patient's trajectory is often more discriminating than pain severity.
  • Use a GALS-style screen—gait, arms, legs and spine—to identify regions requiring a detailed examination, but do not let a screen replace targeted assessment of the presenting problem.
  • Look before touching: posture, aids, muscle bulk, scars, rash, psoriasis, nail disease, swelling and how the patient transfers provide high-value information.
  • Compare active, passive and resisted movement to distinguish articular restriction, contractile tissue pain and effort limited by pain or fear.
  • Describe swelling as soft synovitis, effusion, bony enlargement, oedema or a focal mass rather than using the word 'swollen' without anatomy.
  • Examine skin, nails, eyes, mouth, lymph nodes and relevant organ systems when inflammatory or connective-tissue disease is possible.
  • Record function using concrete tasks—walking distance, stairs, dressing, grip, work and sleep—not only a numerical pain score.
  • Consent, privacy, chaperone, communication support and pain-limited adaptation are part of examination accuracy and safety.

Key red flags

Neurovascular threat

Disproportionate pain, tense swelling, pallor, pulse change, progressive weakness or sensory loss requires immediate trauma, vascular or surgical escalation rather than completion of routine tests.

Organ-threatening systemic disease

Purpura with neuropathy, haematuria or proteinuria, hypoxia, severe cytopenia, myocarditis or new neurological dysfunction may indicate organ-threatening immune disease and requires urgent specialty assessment.

Investigation priorities

01
GALS musculoskeletal screenFirst step

Identify gait, upper-limb, lower-limb and spinal abnormalities requiring regional examination.

Management branches

First encounterScreen, localise and define the phenotype

A new musculoskeletal complaint without current physiological instability.

  1. Take a timed history covering inflammation, distribution, systemic associations, function, medicines and red flags before selecting the depth of examination.
  2. Perform general inspection and a GALS-style screen, then examine abnormal and symptom-relevant regions with comparison, active, passive and resisted movement.
  3. Summarise anatomy, inflammatory probability, systemic features and uncertainty; order only investigations that answer the resulting clinical questions.
Open full textbook →Answer 2 questions
Sources and review status4 sources · checked 27 Aug 2026 · clinical review pending+
Sources

Sources and review status

National guidance is shown before implementation-dependent detail. Apply principles in context and verify current guidance when a decision affects care. Source check completed 27 Aug 2026; clinical approval remains outstanding.

  • NICE NG100 rheumatoid arthritisClinical synovitis and referral principles.
  • NICE NG65 spondyloarthritisExamination features and extra-articular associations.
  • NICE NG226 osteoarthritisClinical assessment of common mechanical joint disease.
  • British Society for Rheumatology guidelinesSpecialist examination and disease-management standards.

Editorial contact: Doctor’s Passport editorial team. Source-check date is separate from clinical approval. Report a content problem · Content changes

Authoring stateRapid draftClinical stateAwaiting reviewJurisdictionUnited Kingdom